Zebulon Butler's charge to the new President of Oakland College

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

In December 1851, following the tragic murder of President Jeremiah Chamberlain three months before, Oakland College in Lorman, Mississippi (now known as Alcorn State University) inaugurated a new President, Robert L. Stanton. On that occasion the charge to the new President was delivered by Zebulon Butler, who had helped to pioneer Presbyterianism in the area around Port Gibson, Mississippi.

Rev. Butler’s inspirational words that day are worthy of remembrance.

Let the Presidents in other Colleges strive for literary distinction, and be held to duty by the charm of wealth, or the world’s coveted otium cum dignitate; be it ever your aim, to please our Master and glorify his name.

This College is the child of Religion; and over its interests the Omnipotent Redeemer will ever keep a sleepless watch. To its members, you must exhibit, in doctrine, an unalloyed evangelism, with the mingling of sectarianism; and in practice, all the loveliness of Christian character, undimmed by worldliness, selfishness, intolerance, or ostentation.

I would then, most earnestly entreat you, as a co-worker in the cause of Letters and Religion, to enter upon this noble enterprize in the spirit of untainted benevolence, and unflinching fortitude; and resolved on continuance, despite of toil, disappointment, opposition, poverty, sickness, or “any of the ills which flesh is heir to,” and to which virtue is exposed. You have a bring example in the life and character of your martyred predecessor, whose noble deeds we this day commemorate. He found not “the primrose path of dalliance,” but the constant fight of faith: and by his toils, his tears, and his blood, we hope he has achieved the conquest. And yours may be a work of comparative repose, in building up this Institution, in the sylvan shades of Mississippi. Yes, I am certain, you have been moved by the impulse of holy benevolence, and a willingness “to spend, and be spent” in the cause of Truth, and for the interests of our race.

Such being our views and sentiments, in the name of the Board of Directors and Trustees, I promise you our sympathies, our prayers, and our faithful cooperation, in your work of faith and labor of love; and if we prove, reciprocally, “steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord,” we are infallibly assured, that this Institution shall advance and improve, till it shall be the proudest monument and richest blessing of which Mississippi can boast.

With such words was the tenure of Rev. Stanton inaugurated as President of Oakland College. He went on to serve as Moderator of the PCUSA General Assembly in 1866. But as we recall the events of that day in December 1851, the charge of Rev. Butler may inspire others, even beyond the “sylvan shades of Mississippi,” to aspire, by the help of the Holy Spirit, to both virtuous Christian conduct as well as excellence in scholarship.

In defense of a learned ministry: George A. Baxter

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

In his notable ordination sermon for William McPheeters, preached at Bethel Presbyterian Church in Augusta County, Virginia, in 1806, George Addison Baxter, besides noting the necessity of ordination and election, as well as the duties of the gospel ministry, in speaking of the qualifications for the office he also articulated a defense of what later became Samuel Miller’s 1812 clarion call at Princeton for “an able and learned ministry.”

The the text upon which Baxter preached was 1 Tim. 3:1: “This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.” He says that “vital piety” is the chief qualification for such a man. And so it is. But then he goes on to add remarks that lay the groundwork for solid Biblical training for ministers. He joins the head with the heart in his description of the godly minister.

But I think it not only necessary that a minister should possess religion, and that in an eminent degree, he ought to be a man of the most upright, exemplary, and prudent conduct, patient, and forbearing, and able, on all occasions, to command his own temper. I mention this, because there are some professors of religion, of whom charity would teach us to hope well, who are, notwithstanding, subject to a fickleness and inconsistency of conduct, which would be very incompatible with the office of the gospel ministry. Together with the qualifications already mentioned, I think it very desirable, if not absolutely necessary, that a minister of Christ, should possess, in a good degree, the assurance of faith, and a warm zeal for glorifying God in the gospel of his Son.

It is undoubtedly of great importance, that the work of the ministry should not be committed to weak or ignorant men, who might be unable to teach others; competent gifts, as well as graces are indispensably requisite. I do not mean, that candidates ought to be rejected for the want of preeminent talents, but a gospel minister ought to possess a mind naturally sound, and well cultivated. A liberal education may not in all cases be indispensably necessary - uncommon natural talents combined with certain circumstances, may compensate in some degree for the want of improvement; but generally speaking, I think what is commonly called a liberal education ought to be required. A minister of Christ should certainly attend to all those branches of human learning, which might enable him to deliver his message with propriety; and in order to understand his message he ought to be acquainted with the sacred scriptures, in the original languages. There may be some dispute as to the course of study most proper to effect the first of the purposes, or to qualify a man for speaking, but it is certain that to accomplish both the purposes just mentioned, a considerable course of human learning, is absolutely requisite.

But there are some denominations in the world, who declare absolutely against the necessity of a learned ministry, and in support of their sentiments, allege the example of our Saviour, who chose fishermen and mechanics to be the first ministers of the new testament. Their error however, as happens in almost every case of bad reasoning, consists in comparing things which do not resemble. It is true that our Saviour in the first instance, chose mechanics and fishermen to publish the gospel: but to say nothing of the advantages which these men derived from his personal instructions and example, for upwards of three years; when he sent them in to the world, he endowed them with miraculous qualifications; he enabled them to perform miracles, to speak all languages that were necessary, and by a supernatural inspiration, instructed them what they ought to speak. ‘But when they shall deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in the same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not yet that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you’ [Matt. x.19-20]. Here now, were men, endowed with every qualification, that can be conceived of, or supposed necessary for the purpose. The gift of miracles which arrested the attention and carried conviction to the consciences of the world - the gift of tongues which contributed to the same end, and also furnished them with an opportunity of communicating the treasures of the gospel to all nations - and the spirit of inspiration, which enabled them to give the most appropriate and salutary instructions, on every occasion. I should think, if any thing can be inferred from our Saviour’s example in this case, taking the whole of it together, it would be that a minister of Christ, ought to possess all qualifications necessary for convincing and instructing the world.

But those with whom we contend, will suppose that by possessing real religion, and being taught in the school of Christ, they obtain all the knowledge and qualifications which are necessary. In reply to this, I will readily admit that religion is the best preparative, for understanding the word of God, and I have no doubt the divine Spirit, conspiring with the use of means, greatly assists a pious minister in his studies. But distinct from the qualifications which grace may confer, there are others absolutely necessary, and which may be acquired by a course of human means. It will, no doubt be admitted, as of the first importance, that a gospel minister should have a correct knowledge of the holy scriptures, for without this he is no better than the blind leading the blind. But to understand the holy scriptures, we should be acquainted with them, in the original languages, we should be acquainted with the history of those customs, and events, in the midst of which the inspired penman wrote, and to which they frequently allude; we should be versed in literary science, so as to understand the different modes of writing - the different phrases and figures with which all compositions abound, and the rules of interpretation, to which all writings human or divine, must be subjected, without some knowledge of this kind we shall not be qualified even to follow a good Commentator on the scriptures, or to form any opinion for ourselves. But how is this knowledge to be obtained? It may as already said be obtained by human means, or it might be conferred by the extraordinary inspiration of the divine Spirit. But those who neglect the natural means, and pretend that divine teaching gives them all necessary knowledge, are pretending to an inspiration which supersedes the use of means, and is therefore very distinct from the common operations of grace; for common grace does not supersede means, but encourages and assists in the use of them. But when any one makes pretensions of this kind, he ought to support them by miracles, or some supernatural evidences. The teaching of which he speaks is a secret miracle, and amounts to something like that inspiration which the apostles possessed, and if it be of this kind it needs a public miracle to make it credible. All pretending therefore that we are taught by the divine Spirit what things we ought to learn, as others learn them, should be rejected in the present day, as self-righteous presumption: and if any people give credit to such pretensions, they are manifestly in the high road of error and delusion: and what is worse, they put themselves under the influence of a delusion, which cannot be corrected or reasoned down because they do not profess to be led by reason, or evidence, or scripture, but by the unsupported assertions of a fellow creature. It perhaps would be well to recollect, that the plain line of distinction between impostures, and the real messengers of heaven, has been pretty much the same in every age. An impostor never proves his assertions. Mahomet had his secret miracles and inspirations, but he did not pretend to confirm them by any public miracles; and modern impostors, have their illumination and teachings for which they can give no evidence but their own assertion. On the other hand the real messengers of grace always deal with mankind as with reasonable creatures; when they introduced a divine revelation into the world at first they confirmed it by sufficient and undeniable miracles, and since the age of miracles has ceased they require the belief of nothing but what can be proved from a revelation sufficiently authenticated. These observations will, I trust, be sufficient to show that the improvement or knowledge necessary for the ministerial office are not to be expected in a supernatural way, and therefore that a course of scientific education is absolutely necessary.

But let it be remembered, that although all knowledge may be useful to a clergyman, his principal attention should be turned to the subject of divinity. His business is to understand and teach the doctrines of the word of God, and every man ought to be better acquainted with what belongs immediately to his own profession, than with any thing else. I have now taken a brief view of the principal things necessary to qualify a man for preaching the gospel. What I have mentioned are real and cordial religion, a prudent and upright moral deportment, a good degree of the assurance of faith, a fervent zeal for glorifying God in the gospel of his Son, and a mind sufficiently improved with useful knowledge. These things taken together and connected with a favorable train of providences, constitute what may be termed a divine call to the ministerial office. They are very much mistaken, who suppose a ministerial call to consist in blind impulses or impressions, of which a person can give no rational account, and which have no relation to his fitness for the work. A ministerial call comprehends all the necessary qualifications for the office, both human and divine. And a ministerial call without ministerial qualifications, in the greatest absurdity in the world.

In line with Presbyterians before and after him, Baxter here articulates an understanding of the qualifications for the gospel ministry that show the necessity for a well-rounded education, encompassing many branches of human learning, subordinate to the queen of sciences, that is, divinity. The faithful minister, in the age wherein apostolic miracles have ceased, must join human learning with divine knowledge, to best and most adequately deliver the message of reconciliation between God and man. An able and learned ministry is what God calls men to in accordance with his gracious declaration to mankind: “Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool” (Isa. 1:18).

J.W. Rosebro on seeking the Lord

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

From the Southern Presbyterian Pulpit (1896), today we highlight a sermon by J.W. Rosebro which is based on Isa. 55:6: “Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near." As Rosebro notes, the text is both a invitation and a command, both a privilege and a duty, and incorporates both a promise and a warning.

Rosebro (1847-1912) was educated at Davidson College, North Carolina, Princeton University, and Union Seminary in Richmond, Virginia. He served pastorates at Mossy Creek Presbyterian Church in Augusta County, Virginia; Lewisburg, West Virginia; and at the Tabb Street Presbyterian Church in Petersburg, Virginia. He also served as President of Fredericksburg College (Virginia); director of Union Seminary, Richmond; and as a professor at Southwestern Presbyterian University in Clarksville, Tennessee. He was the son-in-law of B.M. Smith.

Returning to our sermon, after an insightful introduction showing the connective tissues between the 53rd, 54th and 55th chapters of Isaiah, Roseboro shows the connection between God’s gracious invitation and firm command.

The command is, "Seek ye the Lord." It comes from one who has the right to command. Let not the fulness and freeness of the invitation lead you to think you have nothing to do. It is true Jesus says he came to seek as well as save the lost; yet he also declares we must seek if we would find. It is true, he stands at the door and knocks, yet must we knock if we would have it opened unto us. It is true, God opens wide the door of his grace and proclaims, “whosoever will may come”; yet must we "strive to enter in." He offers the water of life “without money”; yet must we “buy” it. God presses the gift of eternal life on us; yet is it true, “I will yet for this be inquired of by the house of Israel." God forces himself on no soul. He offers himself, and then it is our privilege, our duty to "seek the Lord.” We cannot sit down and wait for salvation; we must seek the Lord, though he. is not far from us.

It is on the basis of Christ’s work as Redeemer, seen so vividly in Isa. 53, that the promises given to those who come at God’s gracious call do rest.

If God invites us to come and commands us to come, there is surely an implied promise of acceptance, when we obey the command and accept the invitation. He has filled his book with richest promises and holds up before us one illustration after another, that we may see how sinful souls came to accept his invitation and that none ever went away unblest. He assures us that the favor of God standeth sure, and that '''whosoever'' cometh to drink of this water shall receive it without money….It is a glorious, amazing truth, that since Jesus died God is graciously bound to receive every soul that comes trusting in Jesus who died.

Yet with the call, there is an admonition to the hearer.

The preacher would not be faithful to you did he not press on your thoughts the warning in this text. Do not the words, "while he may be found," "while he is near,” warn us that there is a time when he may not be found, when he is not near?

This is the full-orbed, whole gospel message which Rosebro conveys to his auditors and readers.

Oh! while the Spirit is whispering in your heart, "To-day, if ye will hear his voice, harden not your heart," while Jesus once more invites, while God is near, come! come! Provoke not that state in which it will be impossible to renew you again to repentance. It were better for you, if you had never been born.

Begin now to seek the Lord. Stop and think. You cannot stop and think of your sin and ingratitude against such love and patience without coming to repentance. You cannot think of Jesus bearing your guilt, of his suffering and death for you, without learning to love him who thus first loved you. "My people will not consider" is the mournful charge God brings against us. Therefore does he entreat us to — "Come now let us reason together." "Harden not your heart,” but "seek ye the Lord while he may be found; call ye upon him while he is near.”

Read the full sermon by Rosebro here. Oh, may the Spirit of God quicken us to draw near and not shrink back when God graciously calls us to himself. To God be the glory for his kindness and love towards undeserving, unworthy sinners for Christ’s sake.

A Preface to the Bible by John Witherspoon

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

The first complete English Bible published in America was by Robert Aitken in 1782. The first family Bible published in America (Trenton, New Jersey) was by Isaac Collins in 1791. The 1791 Collins Bible featured a preface to the reader that was written by John Witherspoon. This preface was reprinted in many other succeeding editions of the Holy Scriptures, including an 1801 edition of the King James Version which is available to read at Log College Press.

This preface is a memorable history and defense of translating the Word of God from Hebrew and Greek into the vernacular languages. Witherspoon highlights “the providence of God” made “manifest in” the “preservation and purity” of the Holy Scriptures as he describes the historical process by which the English Bible was translated for American readers. It is a brief but well-stated introduction to a translation beloved by many. Read it in full here.


Postscript on Witherspoon:

Last month we published a blog post on “John Witherspoon’s Letter From a Blacksmith.” An alert reader reached out to us to let us know that the attribution of Witherspoon as the author of this anonymously-published 1759 letter is disputed and far from clear. As a result of our friend’s helpful information, and following further research, we have removed that letter from Witherspoon’s page. It is unknown for certain who wrote it. But in the meantime, we have also added many more works by Witherspoon, including the preface to the Bible noted above. Thank you to our friend for reaching out to help us clarify this point.

John Holt Rice: "I have more books than I can read"

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

What and where my relish for books, which I may be hungry for? Lord, Because I shall see thee, or serve thee, the more for the reading of them. – Cotton Mather

Not long after Archibald Alexander’s inauguration as the first Professor at Princeton Theological Seminary, he made a significant addition to his collection of books with the acquisition of a private library that belonged to a Dutch Reformed minister. Hughes Oliphant Old tells us that

At one point he was able to buy the private library of a learned Dutch theologian, the Reverend Mr. John van Harlingen. This provided him with many of the classics of Reformed theology from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries as well as editions of the Church Fathers (The Reading and Preaching of the Scriptures in the Worship of the Christian Church, Vol. 6, p. 233).

After hearing of this acquisition, his friend John Holt Rice wrote to him on November 4, 1813 to commend his purchase.

I could not help exclaiming when I heard of the fine library you had purchased, "O fortunatum!" but I could hardly add, "equidem hand invideo" But why should I repine? I have more books than I can read.

This is recorded in J.W. Alexander’s Life of Archibald Alexander, p. 353, but the full letter by Rice is found here.

Rice describes what the Japanese refer to as Tsundoku, having more books than one can read. We have previously made mention of this concept. If one is to err, it may be best to err on the side of having more books than one can read, than on the other side. But nevertheless, it is fascinating to read about the libraries and book purchases of godly men who have gone before. And, of course, it is best to read all that we can to the glory of God!

Geerhardus Vos on the Fruits of the Spirit

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law (Gal. 5:22-23).

In 1915, James Hastings published his Dictionary of the Apostolic Church in 2 volumes for which Geerhardus Vos contributed nine articles. Many of these address the fruits of the Spirit as outlined in Galatians 5:22-23. Together, they constitute a rich and insightful description of the virtues and graces of the Christian life.

Articles he wrote, which have recently been added to Log College include Brotherly Love / Love, Goodness, Joy, Peace, Longsuffering. He also wrote on Kindness and Pity / Compassion. In the first article, he writes:

Religious love in general is a supernatural product. It originates not spontaneously from a sinful soil, but in response to the sovereign love of God. and that under the influence of the Spirit (Ro 5.5-8, 1 Co 8.3 [where 'is known of him' = 'has become the object of his love']. Gal 4.9 [where 'to be known by God' has the same pregnant sense], 1 Jn 4.10-19). Love for the brethren specifically is also a product of regeneration (1 P 1.22-23; cf. 1.2-3). Especially in St. Paul, the origin of brotherly love is connected with the supernatural experience of dying with Christ, in which the sinful love of self is destroyed, and love for God, Christ, and the brethren produced in its place (Ro 6.10ff, 7.4, 2 Co 5.14-16, Gal 2.19-20). Accordingly, love for the brethren appears among other virtues and graces as a fruit of the Spirit, a charisma (Ro 15.30, 1 Co 13, Gal 5.22, 6.8-10).

John Murray once wrote, "Dr. Vos is, in my judgment, the most penetrating exegete it has been my privilege to know, and I believe, the most incisive exegete that has appeared in the English-speaking world in this century." Take time to review Vos’ remarks on the fruits of the Spirit as found here.

Remarks on the Providence of God by Alexander McLeod

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

…what in me is dark
Illumine, what is low raise and support;
That, to the height of this great argument,
I may assert Eternal Providence,
And justify the ways of God to men. — John Milton, Paradise Lost, Bk. 1, Lines 22-26

These lines are quoted by Alexander McLeod in a 2-part essay which appeared in the November and December 1822 issues of The Evangelical Witness. The essay, Remarks on the Providence of God, is based on the words of the Psalmist:

The Lord hath prepared his throne in the heavens, and his kingdom ruleth over all (Ps. 103:193).

In defense of what McLeod calls a “mysterious” but “undeniable” doctrine from Scripture — “divine overruling providence” — our author demonstrates that it is reasonable to acknowledge God’s providence over all, that it is a doctrine derived and proved from Scripture, and that objections to the doctrine may be satisfactorily answered.

Looking to the heavens, the seat of God’s throne, one cannot rationally see chaos as the overriding principle of the universe. McLeod points out that all nations acknowledge a God of some sort. Instead, the systemic harmony and connections found in nature speak to the creation of a wise and omnipotent Creator who reigns supreme over all. In concurrence with Romans 1, McLeod argues that all of nature is witness to this truth, that there is, and must be, a God who rules from above.

The “most conclusive” evidence for the doctrine of providence comes from Scripture. From the story of Joseph and his brothers, McLeod shows that God, without being the author of sin, was sovereign over all that happened in Joseph’s life and wrought good out of evil. From the prophecies of Scripture, fulfilled in history, he shows that God’s purposes must of necessity be accomplished though their outworking may outspan the lives of men and the duration of kingdoms, which is only possible for One who rules over time and space. He further elaborates on this by discussing the meaning of Eph. 1:11; Prov. 26:33; Luke 12:6-7; and Ps. 147:4, 17; all of which affirm that God governs the world even in the minutest of details.

After addressing several objections to the doctrine of providence, in particular the usual claim that it makes God the author of sin, McLeod goes on to leave his readers on a great practical encouraging note.

God, indeed, is king over all the earth . His power and his sovereignty are pledged in covenant by his word and his oath, in defence of the redeemed. His all-pervading providence is especially employed in their interest; and we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are called according to his purpose. Murmur not at his dispensations; for the most painful afflictions act, at his command, to promote your everlasting welfare. Droop not at the remembrance of your own unworthiness; for the Lord hath not forgotten you. He that spareth not his own son but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things.

Christians! your Redeemer reigneth. He directs in providence over all the earth. While natural causes proceed to their effects in their natural course, while the moral world proceeds in its successive generations, with an agency that is voluntary. He by a supernatural power controls all causes and results, and gives to them a direction subservient to the interests of his church. The building is safe upon the rock: and the living stones of the temple shall live forevermore. Let Israel rejoice in him that made him. Let the children of Zion be joyful in their king. God in your own nature, your husband, and your high priest, rules upon his throne. Touched with a sense of your infirmities, he will not leave you comfortless. He will guide you with his counsel and afterwards receive you to glory. Praise the Lord, O! Jerusalem; praise thy God, O! Zion, who hath prepared his throne in the heavens, and his kingdom ruleth over all.

Read the full essay here, and consider his helpful exposition of a verse and a principle that is of the highest importance and the greatest comfort to every believer. Hallelujah, the Lord reigns over all!

Log College Press Remembers Thomas Chalmers

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Who is Thomas Chalmers, and what was his significance to 19th century American Presbyterianism?

Thomas Chalmers (1780-1847) was a Scottish Presbyterian churchman and a leader of the Free Church of Scotland, founded after the 1843 “Disruption.” A man of many interests and gifts, he contributed much to the church and the community in which he served. He is known for his eloquent sermons, his voluminous and edifying theological writings, and for his “West Port Experiment” in Edinburgh (1844-1847). He died on May 31, 1847.

J.W. Alexander highly commended the sermons of Thomas Chalmers and Samuel Davies (Letters, Vol. 1, p. 74).

Charles A. Aiken, in his 1879 Tribute to Charles Hodge, wrote that

It was my high privilege to spend with Dr. Chalmers the last evening but one of his life, Saturday, May 28, 1847. At sunrise on the ensuing Monday, the cry rang through Edinburgh, Dr. Chalmers is dead! Not to go into the details of that memorable interview, let it suffice to say, as bearing upon the passage in the text, that I have never received a more cordial and hearty greeting than that with which, taking both my hands in his own, he welcomed me to Morning-side. He had returned from London only the day before, and spoke of himself as being in unusually good health. All the benevolence of his character came out in his genial smile. His courtesy, his affability, the tones of his voice, the graciousness and even warmth of his whole manner, as he talked with me of grave questions with which the Free Church Assembly, then in session, was likely to be agitated, and the kindliness with which, on my rising to leave, he pressed an invitation for us (the ladies of my party had remained at the hotel that evening) to breakfast with him, first on Tuesday and then on Monday morning — all this made a lasting impression upon me so grateful and so vivid that I cannot at all take in that disparaging estimate of his own social nature which I have quoted from his "Sabbath Readings."

While Chalmers lived, and after his death, American Presbyterians wrote often to him and of him. Below are just some of the writings available on Log College Press that concern Chalmers directly.

  • Archibald Alexander, The Works of Doctor Chalmers (1841) and Chalmers’ Mental and Moral Philosophy (1848);

  • J.W. Alexander, The Works of Doctor Chalmers (1841) and Chalmers on Education and Ecclesiastical Economy (1842) [“Chalmers’s experiential preaching and active social philanthropy were of special interest to Alexander in the urban ministry settings where he labored.” — James M. Garretson, Thoughts on Preaching & Pastoral Ministry: Lessons From the Life and Writings of James W. Alexander, p. 296, note 46];

  • Charles Hodge, An Earnest Appeal to the Free Church of Scotland, on the Subject of Economics (1847);

  • Clarence E.N. Macartney, Thomas Chalmers (1919);

  • James McCosh, A Tribute to the Memory of Dr. Chalmers, By a Former Pupil (1847);

  • Alexander McLeod, Review of Thomas Chalmers on Astronomy (1817) and Review of Two Sermons by Thomas Chalmers (1818);

  • James C. Moffat, Life of Thomas Chalmers (1853)';

  • John Holt Rice, August 14, 1819 Letter to Thomas Chalmers (1819, 1835);

  • Thomas Smyth, The Character of the Late Thomas Chalmers, D.D., LL.D. and the Lessons of His Life From Personal Recollections (1847-1848) in Vol. 3 of Smyth’s Works (1908); and

  • William B. Sprague, On the Life and Death of Thomas Chalmers (1847).

Some notable American Presbyterians were, presumably, named for the great Scottish churchman, such as John Thomas Chalmers and Thomas Chalmers Vinson.

Respect was directed both ways across the Atlantic. According to William B. Sprague, Chalmers thought of Samuel Miller’s 1831 essay on The Warrant, Nature, and Duties of the Office of the Ruling Elder as “the very best work that has been given to the church on that subject.” (A Discourse Commemorative of the Rev. Samuel Miller, D.D. (1850), p. 29). (An extract from Miller’s February 28, 1831 letter to Chalmers may be read in The Life of Samuel Miller, Vol. 2, p. 167.)

Chalmers was beloved by both Scottish and American Presbyterians, and many others. We remember him today as we recall his entrance into glory nearly two centuries ago. Read more about him, starting with Moffat’s Life of Chalmers, and the tributes to him by James McCosh, Thomas Smyth and William B. Sprague.

Journeys of a Church Historian: On the trail of William A. Scott

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Over the past few years, this writer has visited the birthplace of Samuel Davies, many of the churches he founded, the repository of his personal Bible with handwritten annotations, the college of which he served as President, and the site of his burial place, among other locations associated with his journey through this mortal life.

He is a favorite theologian of this writer, and so, it was with a sense of empathy that I recently read about Clifford M. Drury’s journey to trace the steps of a beloved minister, William Anderson Scott. The extract below comes Drury’s 1967 biography titled William Andrew Scott: “No Ordinary Man” [see our secondary sources page], pp. 339-343.

Dr. Morton H. Smith once wrote a review of this volume in which he states:

Dr. Clifford M. Drury who for twenty-five years occupied the California Chair of Church History in San Francisco Theological Seminary, has given us a most interesting biography of Dr. William Anderson Scott. Anyone who takes the time to read this volume will [agree] with Dr. Frederick Cropp who introduces it by saying, “Dr. William Anderson Scott, whose life spanned seventy-two years of the nineteenth century, 1813-1885, walked into my life in the pages of this book. Dr. Drury has made him live again, a century later.”

And as the reader hears Dr. Drury below tell the story of his personal experience in re-tracing the steps of a most fascinating figure in American Presbyterian church history, one will take of how history became alive for him, and as Dr. Smith and Dr. Cropp note, alive for the modern reader as well.

On top of the hill on the campus of San Francisco Theological Seminary in San Anselmo, California, is cut stone castle-like building whose gray walls and round tower are covered with ivy. On a certain morning during the last week of September 1919, a new student at the seminary stood before this building. After reading the inscription over the arched entrance, he asked: “Why is this called Scott Library Hall?” He was told: “After Dr. William Anderson Scott who founded this seminary in San Francisco about fifty years ago. This building was erected as a memorial to him.” I was that new student and that was the first time I had ever heard of Dr. Scott.

Since Dr. Scott had died in 1895, there were still living in 1919 a number of people who remembered him. Among them was Arthur W. Foster, a prominent Marin County business man, a trustee of the seminary, and since he had married Louisiana Scott, he was also a son-in-law of the founder. In 1889 Foster had given the seventeen-acre campus in San Anselmo to the Seminary. He was a frequent campus visitor when I was a student and I have vivid memories of his portly figure usually clad in a Prince Albert coat. His silk hat and gold-headed cane made him an impressive figure in my eyes. Mrs. Foster, who often accompanied her husband to the campus, laid the cornerstone of the library building dedicated to the memory of her father on October 17, 1891. There were others whom I came to know who also had memories of the unusual person whose biography I have undertaken to write.

After my graduation from the seminary in 1922, I served for more than fifteen years in several pastorates and then returned to my alma mater in 1938 as a member of the faculty. As Professor of Church History, it was both my duty and my pleasure to delve into the history of Christianity on the Pacific Coast. One day in the basement of Scott Hall I came across three large chests filled with Dr. Scott’s manuscripts. The contents of these chests had previously been damaged by water as the result of a fire in the Foster home. Water poured upon the fire had settled in the basement and had innundated the chests. After the water had drained away, the contents of the chests gradually dried out, but most of the papers were damaged beyond use. After the lapse of many years, the chests were sent to the seminary and stored in the basement of Scott Hall where I found them. Among the papers still readable was Scott’s diary for 1836, several important addresses, some early sermons, and many lectures.

Then came World War II. After serving for five years as a chaplain in the United States Navy, I returned to the campus in 1946 and returned to my attention to Dr. Scott with the hope of some day writing his biography. I began a systematic examination of the large collection of Scott papers which members of the family had given to Bancroft Library, University of California, in Berkeley. This collection contains about nine hundred letters which Scott received or wrote during the years 1832-85; diaries, journals, and record books; hundreds of newspaper clippings dealing largely with controversies in which he was involved; pictures and many other exceedingly rich in detail. No one had ever made a serious study of this bonanza of biographical data.

During the years that followed, sometimes by visits and again by correspondence, I probed into historical collections and libraries scattered throughout the nation for further information about Dr. Scott’s life and work. In the library of the State University of Louisiana at Baton Rouge, important material was located which dealt with the Clay controversy of 1844-47. Original Scott letters were located in the Library of Congress, the Presbyterian Historical Society in Philadelphia, in Princeton Theological Seminary, and in Huntington Library, San Marion, California. The extensive collection of original records of various Presbyterian judicatories on the Pacific Coast, on deposit at San Francisco Theological Seminary, contains a wealth of information dealing with Dr. Scott’s activities in California during the years 1854-85. I also had access to the original records of the two Presbyterian churches he founded in San Francisco, Calvary and St. John’s. Added to these were the original records of the seminary of which he was the chief founder.

Among the important sources of California church history owned by the seminary is the editor’s file of the Pacific for the years under review. This was a New School Presbyterian and Congregational weekly founded in San Francisco in August 1851. The seminary also has the only complete file extant of the Occident, a Presbyterian weekly published in San Francisco 1868-1900. I compiled a page by page index of the Pacific from 1851-69 and of the complete file of the Occident. These indices, consisting of thousands of cards, provided by the magic key which unlocked the hidden historical treasures of these important California church periodicals. The columns of the Pacific for the years of Dr. Scott’s first residence in San Francisco, 1856-61, reveal the unpleasant story of ecclesiastical jealousies within Presbyterian and Congregational circles which contributed much to the series of unhappy events connected with Dr. Scott’s ministry in Calvary Church. Much light is thrown upon the vigilante movement in San Francisco, which Dr. Scott had the courage to oppose, and also upon the conflicting emotions and prejudices which stirred California in the events leading up to the Civil War.

After Dr. Scott was forced to leave California in 1861, he and his family spent two years in France and England. In the spring of 1956, I had opportunity to examine some original ecclesiastical records of the Presbyterian Church of England on deposit in its Historical Society in London. Some information was found therein regarding Dr. Scott’s work in London and Birmingham. After returning to the United States in the summer of 1863, Dr. Scott served as pastor of a Presbyterian church in New York City for six years. The original records were located in the library of Union Theological Seminary in that city.

Added to all that could be gleaned from such manuscript and published materials relating to this long neglected but important churchman, were the personal memories and family traditions. Perhaps the last individual to have personal recollections of both Dr. and Mrs. Scott, was Mrs. Mary F. Kuechler, a granddaughter, of Ross, California. She passed away on May 16, 1965. Stories about Dr. Scott are associated with a number of family heirlooms owned by several of his descendants.

In 1960, having completed some other projects which had priority, I began writing the preliminary sketches of this biography. I soon realized that a personal visit to the scenes connected with Dr. Scott’s youth and to the various parishes he served before going to California was essential. In order to make such an investigation, the seminary granted me sabbatic leave beginning January 1, 1962. The American Philosophical Society of Philadelphia made a grant of $600 for expenses connected with the basic research. On February 26th my wife and I left by automobile for a tour of the South which lasted ten weeks. We visited Dr. Scott’s parishes at Opelousas and New Orleans, Louisiana. He spent two years, 1834-36, in the former and twelve years, 1842-1854, in the latter. In New Orleans, he came to the fulness of his powers as a pulpit orator, and from here in 1858 Dr. Scott was elected Moderator of the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., the highest honor within the power of his church to bestow.

We then visited Tuscaloosa, Alabama, where he had a two-year ministry, 1840-42. From there we proceeded to Montreat, North Carolina, where I had opportunity of consulting Presbyterian judicatory records and periodicals for the years immediately preceding the Civil War. Also at Montreat were the original records of the First Presbyterian Church of New Orleans covering the period that Dr. Scott served as pastor.

From Montreat we drove into eastern Tennessee, first visiting Winchester where Scott, as a young newly-wedded minister, served as principal of female academy and pastor of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church from 1836-38. From there we went to Nashville, passing within a few miles of his birthplace in Marshall County without then knowing its exact location. Scott served as principal of a female academy in Nashville from 1838-40 and also as stated supply of two small country churches. He alternated on week ends going to the Hermitage Church where General Andrew Jackson lived and to Harpeth. Each church was ten or twelve miles distant from Nashville but in different directions. In both places I found the original buildings still standing and had access to the original sessional records. The Scott Collection in Bancroft Library contains some letters from General Jackson to Scott. At Nashville I located the other half of the correspondence, the letters from Scott to Jackson.

We then drove to McKenzie, Tennessee, where the Cumberland Presbyterian Theological Seminary is located. Scott began his ministry in the Cumberland Church and did not transfer to the Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., until 1838. As a Cumberland Presbyterian circuit rider, when only eighteen years old, he spent a year on a circuit which included some thirty communities in northwestern Tennessee. McKenzie lies about in the center of that circuit. With Scott’s 1830 diary before me and with the help of Dr. Thomas Campbell, president of the seminary, we were able to locate many of the communities listed.

All along the way as we followed Scott’s trail, we found new material and much local color, sometimes in the most unexpected places. We met with a generous response from all to whom we turned for help, librarians, pastors, local historians, and just common folk who, when they heard of her quest, cooperated in many ways.

After returning to our home in San Rafael, California, in May 1962, I was able by correspondence to clear up many unsolved questions. By this means the place of Scott’s birth in Marshall County and the grave of his mother near Raleigh were located. Bit by bit, like the pieces of a jig-saw puzzle which had been scattered through 150 years and over half of the continent, the important facts relating to the life and work of Dr. Scott were assembled. Gradually a clearer picture of the boy, the student, the itinerant backwoods preacher, the educator, the orator, the author, and the churchman emerged.

As I sat before my typewriter writing this life of “no ordinary man,” I have had the feeling that Dr. Scott has been looking over my shoulder. Although the portrayal is designed to give a sympathetic interpretation of his life, yet I have not hesitated to record what appear to be personal weaknesses and errors of judgment. Dr. Scott himself would have been the first to deny any claim to perfection. The artist needs both light and shadow to sharpen the outlines of his picture. Most church members today would agree with his stand against the compulsory reading of the Protestant version of the Bible in public schools and with his opposition to the Vigilance Committee’s unlawful activities in San Francisco. They would disapprove, no doubt, his attitude toward slavery and his support of the Southern rebellion against the federal government. Dr. Scott was a Southerner by birth, education, and sympathies. He lived during those critical years preceding the Civil War when the Presbyterian Church was forging its philosophy of the relationship of the church to social issues in the hot fires of sectional controversy. Partly because of the leading role that Scott played in the national affairs of his denomination, he inevitably became a central figure in these discussions.

The story of William Anderson Scott is a vivid commentary on his time. His deep opposition to the Vigilance Committee, for instance, throws much light upon the lawlessness existing in San Francisco in the mid 1850s. In the events surrounding the second hanging of Dr. Scott in effigy before his church on Sunday morning, September 23, 1861, we see how deeply the issues which precipitated the Civil War stirred the citizens of San Francisco. Scott’s close connection with the national leaders of the Presbyterian Church had a direct bearing upon the unfortunate division which split the Old School Assembly of 1861 into the northern and southern branches. Here is a hitherto unexplored chapter in American Presbyterian history.

To recapitulate, the great wealth of source material including nearly nine hundred letters, diaries, journals, books, pamphlets, ecclesiastical records, hundreds of articles in religious and secular periodicals, sermon and lecture notes, together with family memories and personal observations has made this book possible. Herein we can become acquainted not only with what Dr. Scott did and what he said, but also with many of his inner thoughts and feelings. As we move with him through the years, we come to appreciate his problems and share with him his sacrifices and his sufferings. We enter into his dreams and aspirations and rejoice in his accomplishments. When the full story is told, we are amazed to see how one who emerged from such an unpromising backwoods environment, handicapped by a crippled foot, and with such a limited formal education, should have been able to do such.

The journey of a church historian to learn about his subject shows that the past is not dead, but very much alive, which is what we at Log College Press also believe. Get to know Clifford Merrill Drury and William Anderson Scott, among many others associated with American Presbyterianism, at Log College Press.

Log College Resources

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

At Log College Press, we aim to survey the broad landscape of American Presbyterianism, from mainstream denominations to dissenting branches, both conservative and liberal, to provide insight into the history and claims of those who speak for Presbyterianism in America. But we have a special place in our heart for the original Log College, which served as the first Presbyterian seminary in the colonies.

A 19th-century sketch of the Log College with an interesting background described here.

A 19th-century sketch of the Log College with an interesting background described here.

Here is an effort to provide resources for further study on that Log College and specially connected to it. This is not a complete survey, but it is hoped that readers who wish to study the Log College more in-depth can do so ably with the material referenced below.

The Founders of the Log College (c. 1726) were William Tennent, Sr. (1673-1746) and Catherine Kennedy Tennent (1683-1753). Each of their male children were among the graduates of the Log College program of education: Gilbert, William, Jr., John, and Charles. Other famous Log College alumni include Samuel Blair, John Blair, Samuel Finley and Charles Beatty. The Log College planted seeds which later resulted in the founding of Princeton, the Log Colleges of John McMillan, David Caldwell and others.

There are many valuable works about the Log College and its alumni and influence available to read at Log College Press, including:

  • Archibald Alexander - Biographical Sketches of the Founder, and Principal Alumni of the Log College (1845) and Sermons and Essays by the Tennents and Their Contemporaries (1855)

  • Elijah R. Craven - The Log College of Neshaminy and Princeton University (1902)

  • Nathaniel Irwin - Memoirs of the Presbyterian Church of Neshaminey (1793, 1904)

  • Guy S. Klett and Thomas C. Pears, Jr. - Documentary History of William Tennent and the Log College (1940)

  • Thomas Murphy - The Presbytery of the Log College; or, The Cradle of the Presbyterian Church in America (1889)

  • Douglas K. Turner - History of Neshaminy Presbyterian Church of Warwick, Hartsville, Bucks County, PA, 1726-1876 (1876); Sketch of Log College (1886, 1909); and The Log College (1889)

Also of interest is Charles Spencer Richardson, Jr., A Week in Log College Country (1903), available to read here. William B. Sprague’s Annals, Richard Webster’s History of the Presbyterian Church in America, and many other biographical and historical literature is also available to read at Log College Press.

Other works known to the writer, but not yet available on Log College Press include:

  • George H. Ingram - The Story of the Log College (1927) and Biographies of the Alumni of the Log College (1929-1930)

  • Clarence E.N. Macartney - The Log College and the Beginning of Princeton (1946-1947)

  • Richard McIlwaine - The Influence of the Log College in the South (1889)

  • Thomas C. Pears, Jr. - History by Hearsay or New Light on William Tennent: A Footnote on the 'Documentary History of William Tennent (1940)

  • Gary E. Schnittjer - William Tennent and the Log College: A Common Man and an Uncommon Legacy (1992) and The Ingredients of Effective Mentoring: The Log College as a Model for Mentorship (1994)

Books which directly treat aspects of the Log College from the Secondary Sources page at Log College Press include:

  • Milton J. Coalter, Jr. - Gilbert Tennent, Son of Thunder (1986)

  • S. Donald Fortson III - Colonial Presbyterianism: Old Faith in a New Land (2006)

  • John F. Hansen - The Vision That Changed a Nation: The Legacy of William Tennent (2007)

  • Margaret Adair Hunter, Education in Pennsylvania Promoted by the Presbyterian Church, 1726–1837 (1937)

  • Alexander Leitch - A Princeton Companion (1978)

  • Howard Miller - The Revolutionary College: American Presbyterian Higher Education, 1707-1837 (1976)

  • Mary A. Tennent - Light in Darkness: The Story of William Tennent, Sr. and the Log College (1971)

There is a great deal of literature on Princeton which can be read online at Log College Press, or ordered from the Secondary Sources page, which touches on the history of the Log College. Many titles are not mentioned here, but could be included in a more thorough compilation. But it is hoped that the resources highlighted here will provide the student of colonial American Presbyterian history with readily available information to assist in their studies of a remarkable chapter of church history.

And let us remember that “the past is not dead,” because the story of the Tennents and the Log College is but prologue to the present. The William Tennent House Association continues its work in a different direction to make this history and legacy alive and accessible to visitors as well. One Log College, and the many others which followed, did so much to leave a godly legacy for America. We are glad to help others learn more about the story, and we are thankful to God for the legacy.

John Witherspoon's Letter From a Blacksmith

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Blacksmith, A. John Witherspoon, D.D. A letter from…to the ministers and elders of the Church of Scotland…L. 1759. — William Cushing, Initials and Pseudonyms: A Dictionary of Literary Disguises (1885), Vol. 1, p. 36.

Before John Witherspoon came to America to serve as President of Princeton, and before he signed the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, Witherspoon served as a minister of the Church of Scotland. In 1759, while serving as the pastor of Laigh Kirk, Paisley, he published a work under a pseudonym, A.T., supposedly a blacksmith, aimed at reforming contemporary worship: A Letter From a Blacksmith to the Ministers and Elders of the Church of Scotland. Interestingly, the anonymous but learned blacksmith with a heartful desire to see reform in the Church of Scotland references the Ecclesiastical Characteristics, which Witherspoon himself authored in 1753.

The work challenges officers of the church to amend the manner of worship in regards to defects in the public reading of the Scriptures, singing of Psalms, the manner of the administration of the Lord’s Supper, prayer, and preaching. He aims to show that such worship as was achieved by the Reformers had degenerated in the author’s day, and also that set forms of public prayer, which he argues were used by John Knox and others, would be more helpful than the extemporaneous prayers then currently employed.

Witherspoon’s Letter From a Blacksmith has recently been added to Log College Press. It is an intriguing read, especially knowing who the author was - a minister, not a blacksmith, who was in fact, writing to his colleagues. Witherspoon also later served as the convening Moderator of the 1789 General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, which adopted a revised Directory of Worship. Take time to explore this fascinating early work by Witherspoon here.

As noted in a later (June 8, 2021) blog post - Postscript on Witherspoon:

Last month we published a blog post on “John Witherspoon’s Letter From a Blacksmith.” An alert reader reached out to us to let us know that the attribution of Witherspoon as the author of this anonymously-published 1759 letter is disputed and far from clear. As a result of our friend’s helpful information, and following further research, we have removed that letter from Witherspoon’s page. It is unknown for certain who wrote it. But in the meantime, we have also added many more works by Witherspoon, including the preface to the Bible noted above. Thank you to our friend for reaching out to help us clarify this point.

The Princeton Magazine - An Alexander Family Project

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

On March 5, 1850, James W. Alexander wrote to his old friend and long-time correspondent John Hall to tell him about a new publishing venture.

My brother William is about to set up “the Princeton Magazine;” pp. 48, monthly. Of course we shall all help. It will not exclude scientific, classical, crudite, sportive, or Jersey articles. Probably a number out three weeks hence. “Princeton in 1801,” will open it, a reminiscence of my father.

James was referring to William Cowper Alexander’s editorial work on a publication that lasted just one year, but led to a tremendous outpouring of fascinating literature by the Alexander family.

Henry C. Alexander, in his biography of Joseph Addison Alexander, Vol. 2, p. 682, speaks of the family venture thus:

The Magazine was written by members of the family (principally by J.W.A.) with occasional articles by an outsider. The volume contained one hundred and twelve articles. Eighty-three articles were written in the family. To these may be added sixty-one notices of new books. These notices were almost exclusively from the pen of the editor.

John Hall adds that this one volume was treasury of valuable literary output by the family.

Twelve numbers of this magazine appeared in 1850, after which it was discontinued. The brothers James and Addison made it the repository of many of their desultory effusions….In a letter to the editor of these Letters, from the late Mr. Walsh, (Paris, Nov. 12, 1850,) that eminent scholar wrote — “The promise of the youth of the brothers Alexander seems to have been fulfilled. The Magazine abounds with matter which I read with keen relish.” — Forty Years’ Familiar Letters of James W. Alexander, D.D., Vol. 2, p. 112.

Samuel D. Alexander notes the family contributors to The Princeton Magazine in his Catalogue of the Writings of the Alexander Family, but only as to their names, not their specific writings. The articles and book notices by the Alexanders (Archibald, James, Addison and William) are varied and include poetry by Addison, social commentary by James, reminiscences by Archibald and much more. Attribution of these writings largely comes from John Hall and Henry C. Alexander. Sometimes authorship can be ascertained from the nom-de-plumes chosen by the authors, such as “C.Q.” for “Charles Quill,” a favorite pseudonym of James. Many of these “essays, dialogues, satirical squibs, bits of Latin criticism, popular philosophy,” etc. (H.C.A.), showing the wit and humor, knowledge of the world and of Scripture, and the keen intellect of brilliant writers have been added to the respective author pages at Log College Press, including the full volume of the magazine at William C. Alexander’s page. The magazine represents a slice of Princetoniana well worth diving into, and though it only lasted for one year, constitutes a treasury of Alexander family literature that is remarkable in its diversity of topic and quality of writing.

1850 was a very productive year for the Alexanders, and now that these articles are being added to Log College Press, we hope you will see what a treasure The Princeton Magazine of that year was.

J.W. Alexander on Thankful Review following the Lord's Supper

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Q. 175. What is the duty of Christians, after they have received the sacrament of the Lord’s supper?

A. The duty of Christians, after they have received the sacrament of the Lord’s supper, is seriously to consider how they have behaved themselves therein, and with what success; if they find quickening and comfort, to bless God for it, beg the continuance of it, watch against relapses, fulfill their vows, and encourage themselves to a frequent attendance on that ordinance: but if they find no present benefit, more exactly to review their preparation to, and carriage at, the sacrament; in both which, if they can approve themselves to God and their own consciences, they are to wait for the fruit of it in due time: but, if they see they have failed in either, they are to be humbled, and to attend upon it afterwards with more care and diligence. — Westminster Larger Catechism

A wonderful little handbook or manual for those seeking to rightly observe the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper is Plain Words to a Young Communicant (1854) by James W. Alexander (republished in 2000 by Banner Truth under the title Remember Him).

In the space of 85 brief chapters (80 in the Banner of Truth edition), Alexander addresses preparation for the Table, whether doubters can approach the table, self-examination, retrospect following communion, and many various aspects of the Christian Walk, including meditation, prayer, Sabbath-keeping, church attendance, and other means of grace and sanctification. Under the heading “Questions Before the Communion,” he has borrowed from a work by Ashbel Green titled Questions and Counsel for Young Converts (1831) [attributed erroneously by Banner of Truth to William Henry Green]. These questions are helpful to young believers (and old) in ascertaining the state of the soul before God.

There is one chapter especially worth highlighting for those who have just recently partaken of the sacrament: Thankful Review.

Through the tender mercies of our God, the cases are numerous, in which the young communicant retires from the Table of the Lord, strengthened and encouraged. The cardinal truth of Christianity has been set before his thoughts and become incorporated with his faith. He has seen Jesus [John 12:21]. His views of the infinite freedom of salvation have been made more clear. The evidences of his acceptance with God have become brighter. He is more disposed than ever before, to yield himself as a sacrifice, soul, body, and spirit, which is his reasonable service [Rom. 12:1]. Where any part of this is true, you have new cause for gratitude. It is “the Lord thy God which teacheth thee to profit” (Isa. 48:17). Now is the time, to bless him for this grace, and to beg the continuance of it. Now is the time to set a watch against relapses, and to carry into effect the vows which you have made at the Lord’s Table. Henceforth, you will look for the recurrence of this sacrament with a lively expectation, founded on experience.

If you are preparing to partake of the Lord’s Supper or have just partaken, this devotional manual is a good aid to right observance. Read J.W. Alexander’s handbook for communicants in full here.

A remembrance of the genocide in Armenia from the perspective of American Presbyterian missionaries

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

The Christian population was at the mercy of Turks and Kurds and Persians. Dr. Shedd hastened to the Russian Consulate and found it already dismantled and everybody getting ready to leave. It was evident there was no help from the Russians and taking leave of the Consul with the words, ''Panah ba Khuda,” ''Refuge with God," he returned to the city. — Mary Lewis Shedd, writing of her husband in the midst of events in Urmia, Persia (now Iran), on January 1, 1915, as the Armenian genocide was unfolding, in The Measure of a Man: The Life of William Ambrose Shedd, Missionary to Persia (1922), p. 141.

American Presbyterian missionaries to Persia were deeply affected by the events connected with the political situation resulting from World War I, including what has come to be known as the Armenian Genocide, a term first used officially today (April 24, 2021) by an American President, Joseph Biden, on Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day.

The story is told from the perspective of missionaries on the ground, such as William Ambrose Shedd and his wife Mary Lewis Shedd, and others including Mary A. Schauffler Labaree Platt, author of The War Journal of a Missionary in Persia (1915), and Frederick G. Coan, author of Yesterdays in Persia and Kurdistan (1939) [not yet available on Log College Press, but hopefully soon]. Coan’s 1918 account of some aspects of the genocide is particularly gripping.

Simonetta Carr published a very helpful sketch last year of these tragic events as they relate to the Shedds which is available here. The atrocities are heart-breaking to read about. It is estimated that around 1 million Armenians were slaughtered. Many American Presbyterians were eyewitnesses to the horrors of massacre and war resulting in the shedding of much innocent blood. It was a time of grief and sadness, but also a time of courage and of prayer in the midst of suffering. But we do well to harken to the words (which Simonetta has highlighted, found in Mary L. Shedd, The Measure of a Man: The Life of William Ambrose Shedd, Missionary to Persia (1922), p. 280) of Rev. Shedd, who wrote in 1916:

It lies with us to see that the blood shed and the suffering endured are not in vain. May God grant and may we who know so well the wrongs that have been borne, so labor that the cause of these wrongs be removed. That will be done when Christ rules in the hearts of those who profess His name and is acknowledged by all, not merely as a great prophet but as the Saviour for Whose coming prophecy prepared the way, Who is the fulfillment of revelation, and in Whom human destiny will find its goal.

Henry Kollock: If Christ Be Loved

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

The Rev. Henry Kollock was a much-admired pastor at the Independent Presbyterian Church of Savannah, Georgia. He died young, at the age of 41, but after his death four volumes of his sermons were published. One volume was published during his lifetime: Sermons on Various Subjects (1811).

One of the particular sermons contained in this volume is “Love to the Saviour” (Sermon XIII), a memorable discourse which stirs the heart to greater adoration of our Redeemer.

If Christ be loved, the Holy Spirit who “takes of the things of Christ and shews them unto us,” will be loved also: we shall gladly cherish his dictates and motions upon the heart; we shall listen to his voice directing us in our duty, with joy receive his testimony in the inner man, open our souls for the reception of his influences, and be careful not to quench, to grieve, or resist him. If Christ be loved, his scriptures which contain his will, his promises, his threatnings will be loved also: “O how I love thy law; it is my meditation all the day;” is the language of him who has this affection. If Christ be loved, his ordinances where he is wont to meet with his people will be most dear: “How amiable are thy tabernacles, O Lord of hosts; a day in thy courts is better than a thousand;” this is the sentiment of their hearts whose affections are fixed upon Jesus, and who attend his ordinances not to pay him a cold formal visit, but to enjoy delicious intercourse with him. If Christ be loved, his children who bear his image will be loved: “By this,” saith the Saviour, “shall men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love to one another.” If we admire the perfections of the Lord, we must delight to see these perfections enstamped upon any of his creatures; if we love him we cannot be indifferent to those who are the objects his tenderest affection. If Christ be loved, his cause and interest will lie near our hearts: if his mercies be despised, his authority be contemned, his glories overlooked by a thoughtless world, his friends are deeply grieved, and exclaim with David, “Rivers of waters run down mine eyes because men keep not thy law;” or with Jeremiah, “Because you will not hear, my soul shall weep in secret places for you.”

May these words ring in our ears today. With so many reasons and motives to do so, how our hearts ought to be stirred up with more ardent love to the one who gave himself for us and in whose image we are remade when we are born again. Jesus Christ is the only true Savior, and how we ought to love the one who first loved us, and to manifest that love in our lives, thoughts and actions. Read Henry Kollock’s sermon in full here.

Sabbath Evenings with the Matthews Family

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

W.D. Ralston spent time in his younger days teaching at country schools and one winter during the 1850s resided with a family which was then associated with the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (Ralston was then connected to the Associate Presbyterian Church). Both of these groups, which merged to form the United Presbyterian Church of North America in 1858, held to the practice of exclusive psalmody.

Ralston used this time with the Matthews Family to produce a manuscript describing their Sabbath evening discussions on the topic of psalmody which was published “over twenty years” later as Talks on Psalmody in the Matthews Family (1877). Many topics related to the issue of psalmody are covered in this fascinating volume, such as Christ in the Psalms, whether exclusive psalmody is warranted from Scripture, and the place of hymns. Presented in conversational style, the discussions that are recorded are a very close representation of those which actually occurred on Sabbath evenings in the Matthews Family.

However, this post is not so much about psalmody as it is about how Sabbath evenings were spent in general by a godly Christian family.

Family Worship.png

Ralston wrote of how their Sabbath evenings were spent, and how these conversations came about. In so doing, he highlighted an important aspect of Sabbath-keeping, which is the aim to keep the whole day holy (Ex. 20:8; WCF 21:8), including the evening hours after church services were over.

While a student, I taught several terms of public school in country districts. On the last day of October, 18—, I left my father’s house to take charge of a school some twenty miles distant. The family with whom I was to board were entire strangers. My parents were members of the Associate Presbyterian church, or the Seceder Churcher, as it was mostly called, while the family with whom I was to board belonged to the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. In the year 1858, these two bodies were united, and formed the United Presbyterian Church.

The winter I spent with that family was a pleasant and profitable one; and as I shall write of the persons composing the family, I will here describe them. The father, and mother, John, and Mary Matthews, were Americans by birth, and had received a good common education. The wife, before marriage, had taught school for several years. John Matthews had a remarkable memory. He seemed to remember all he read. He was not a great talker, but preferred to read, or listen to others; still when led into conversation, it was a pleasure to listen to him. He had a happy way of illustrating what he said, which was pleasing to the young. He would tell many stories and anecdotes to illustrate, and enforce what he said.

They had three children, — John thirteen, Mary twelve, and Willie nine. For their age, the children were well-informed, both in regard to religious truths, and general knowledge. When I saw how perseveringly the parents labored for their improvement, I felt they could not be otherwise.

They seldom had preaching on Sabbath-night in their church, and therefore they devoted the entire evening to the study of the Scriptures at home. Their evening work was attended to early, and as soon as the candles were lighted, their study of the Scriptures commenced. The teacher was the mother, not because she excelled her husband in knowledge, but because her teaching school had better prepared her for imparting instruction.

The first exercise was the Catechism, which all knew; but still, half of it was asked each Sabbath-evening, to keep it fresh in their memories. After that, they took up some subject previously selected. The first Sabbath-evening I was there, the subject was Zaccheus the publican; on the second, it was the destruction of Jerico. Mr. Matthews sat listening, occasionally adding a word or two, and at the close related one or more interesting stories bearing upon the object for the evening, and then the exercises were closed with the usual evening worship.

Ralston writes that one evening Mr. Matthews was led to engage in a discussion of Psalmody with a neighbor who thought hymns were to be preferred over Psalms in worship. This debate occasioned a series of family discussions related to various aspects of Psalmody which were held over many Sabbath evenings. It was while these conversations were ongoing that Ralston himself took out a notebook and jotted down notes about what was discussed. Later, at Mr. Matthews’ request, and with the childrens’ assistance, entire conversations were written down nearly verbatim, with the intent that their discussions, and Mr. Matthews’ illustrations, which were so profitable to the family, could be shared with others. It was Mr. Matthews’ wish that the manuscript which resulted from those notes be published to aid families and children in better understanding why they believed as they did with respect to Psalmody, which he viewed as a legacy bequeathed to the church at the end of his life.

Many families are weary at the end of the day, even (or especially) a Sabbath day. But there can be great fruit in the time well-spent that makes up a Sabbath evening. There is perhaps no better time to impart Biblical truth to the children, or to encourage one another, then when sweet “market day of the soul” is nearing the end, and the family is together for the purpose of worship and mutual edification. The Matthews Family experience, as recorded by Ralston, is a fascinating testimony to this precious truth.

Justice Harlan's Dissent: "Our Constitution is color-blind."

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in Plessy v. Ferguson which affirmed the doctrine of “separate but equal” in favor of the state of Louisiana’s right to maintain racially segregated public transportation systems. The vote was 7-1 and the lone dissenter was Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan.

Justice Harlan was also a ruling elder and a Sunday School teacher at the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C. Wallace Radcliffe presided over the justice’s funeral when he passed away in 1911. Harlan’s dissent (recently added to Log College Press) contains some memorable words that reflect his conviction that disparate treatment of citizens by the government based on race was unjust.

But in view of the constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful. The law regards man as man, and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved. It is, therefore, to be regretted that this high tribunal, the final expositor of the fundamental law of the land, has reached the conclusion that it is competent for a State to regulate the enjoyment by citizens of their civil rights solely upon the basis of race. In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott case.

Lady Justice and her blindfold.

Lady Justice and her blindfold.

Although he failed to persuade his colleagues in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) that “separate but equal” public education was unconstitutional, thus essentially rendering Plessy v. Ferguson a dead letter.

The principle that he stood for was an outworking of his religious beliefs. James W. Gordon wrote in “Religion and the First Justice Harlan: A Case Study in Late Nineteenth-Century Presbyterian Constitutionalism” Marquette Law Review Vol. 85, No. 2 (2001):

The first Justice John Marshall Harlan was a deeply religious man. As a devout and life-long "Old School" Presbyterian, Harlan's religious convictions shaped his style as a judge. They also provided him with a concrete standard against which to measure the "rightness" or "wrongness" of the world he saw around him, a standard he often consciously or unconsciously applied in his public life.

Justice Harlan also opposed tolerating polygamy in U.S. territories, siding with the majority in Reynolds v. United States (1879) and in Davis v. Beason (1890), and again opposed racial segregation as the lone dissenter in Berea College v. Kentucky (1908).

Certainly it is the case that the U.S. Constitution has deficiencies which not only include a failure to acknowledge God or Jesus Christ as the fountain of its authority, but also its original acceptance of slavery and the Three-Fifths Compromise in which slaves were reckoned as less than a person for census purposes. But Justice Harlan was a man of principle regarding Christian civil ethics, particularly with respect to the idea that race should not be a factor in how the government treats one citizen in contrast to another. “Our Constitution is color-blind,” said Justice Harlan.

An American Presbyterian remembers the Edict of Nantes

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

It was on April 13, 1598 that the Edict of Nantes was signed by Henry IV of France granting a measure of religious liberty to French Huguenots after decades of armed conflict with the Roman Catholic majority. This event is a major landmark in the history of Western civilization as well as Protestant church history. The civil and religious freedom granted to suffering Huguenots in 1598 was gradually undermined and finally revoked by Louis XIX in October 1685, leading to the world-wide French Huguenot Diaspora. But freedom, in God’s Providence, always find a path to victory over tyranny.

The signing of the Edict of Nantes by Henry IV on April 13, 1598.

The signing of the Edict of Nantes by Henry IV on April 13, 1598.

For reflections on the importance of the Edict of Nantes, we turn today to the writings of an American Presbyterian who specialized in the history of the French Huguenots, Henry Martyn Baird, who called it “one of the most illustrious of laws ever enacted in behalf of religious liberty” (The Huguenots and Henry of Navarre, Vol. 2 (1886), p. 414.

For both Henry M. Baird and his brother Charles, the Edict and its Revocation were among the most important miles in the history of the French Huguenots and indeed in world history.

It was on the 200th anniversary of the Revocation that Henry addressed the Huguenot Society of America on The Edict of Nantes and Its Recall (1886) and it was on the 300th anniversary of the Edict itself that Henry addressed that same body on The Strength and Weakness of the Edict of Nantes (1898). The combined historical studies by Henry and Charles of the rise and diaspora of the French Huguenots, and Henry of Navarre (Henry IV), all highlight the Edict as the highwater mark of civil and religious liberty in this period, and its Revocation as a terrible blow to freedom (which God nevertheless used for much good in spreading his people across the globe), and thus it is worth recalling to mind this chapter of church history. It is never inapropos, and indeed always timely, to study the history and principles of freedom under God.

Gilbert Tennent on the Chief End of Man

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

WSC Chief End of Man.png

In answer to perhaps the most profound question that can be asked, "What is the chief end of man?" the Westminster Assembly in its Shorter Catechism affirms that "Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever." This simple summation of the purpose of life consists of two clauses, and the relationship between the two, as stated by Westminster, has been the subject of some interest and study, particularly in light of John Piper's "Christian Hedonism" philosophy.

At the beginning of a series of sermons based on the Westminster Shorter Catechism preached by Gilbert Tennent in 1743, published a year later, Tennent addresses the distinction between aiming at God’s glory and aiming at our enjoyment of Him.

4th. Propos’d, which was to shew, why should we aim at the Glory of God as our chief Mark in all our Actions?

It is true eternal Salvation, or our enjoying God (which supposes our Propriety in, or rightful claim to God as ours; and implies our Communion with him here imperfectly, and in the Life to come perfectly) is a great Motive of religious Obedience, the Expectation thereof should doubtless influence and excite us in the Service of God.

And most certainly there is a Connection between glorifying and enjoying God, so that he who rightly performs the former, is not like to miss the latter. Psa. 50.23. Whoso offereth Praise glorifieth me. And to him that ordereth his Conversation aright, will I shew the Salvation of God.

That enjoying of God may be likewise call’d an End, and that properly, (but a Subordinate one) which we may and ought to aim at in our religious Obedience. And it is doubtless and End, the Highest in its Kind, and next, in Order, Dignity, and Importance, to that of the Glory of God. On this account the venerable Assembly at Westminster in their larger catechism, call it the highest End of Man; it is certainly that, which intelligent Beings should seek after, next to the divine Glory. The Assembly did not design to put the aforesaid Ends upon a Par or equal Balance, by their Answer to the first Question in their Catechisms, in which they are both mention’d together; No, by no means, they intend only to represent the Connection subsisting between them, as well as their infinite Moment and Importance, and the Order in which we should seek after them; which is evident from their different Manner of wording them, the Order in which they place them, and the Scriptures they bring for the Confirmation of what they offer upon this Head. In the Larger Catechism the Question is worded thus, What is the chief and highest End of Man. God’s Glory, they signify by their answer, is the chief End of Man; and enjoying God fully, the highest End, i.e. (as has been before observ’d) of its kind, next to the other: Their giving the Glory of God the first Place in their Answer, shews that they prefer it in point of Dignity to the other, altho’ those Ends are inseperably connected together, (in the Manner before mention’d) yet they are really distinguished: It is one Thing to aim at God’s Honour, and another to aim at our own Comfort, and have no true regard to God’s Glory at all, therefore they cannot be both Supreme; but one must be Chief and the other Subordinate or refer’d to it.

There is a reason for the order of words in the answer to the question, and there is an intimate connection between the two aims of life. Thus, in the view of Gilbert Tennent (and others), God’s glory must precede our enjoyment of Him in the aims of life, and only in this order do the two goals rightly make up our chief end. Read more of what Tennent has to say on this point and others from the catechism here.

J.A. Kohout: A Bohemian Presbyterian in Virginia

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

For our citizenship is in heaven… (Phil. 3:20)

In the early 20th century, immigrants from Bohemia (called Czechoslovakia after World War I, now known as the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic) settled in various parts of the United States, one of which came to be called New Bohemia, in Prince George County, Virginia. That community still endures a century later.

Early on a Bohemian-born former Roman Catholic by the name of Joseph Alois Kohout (1863-1941) and his wife Mathilda (1874-1939) bought a farm and began to minister to the immigrants who settled just outside Petersburg. Rev. Kohout wrote in 1914:

It was in the month of May, 1907, that I first visited Virginia, coming from the Northumberland Presbytery, Pa., and found at that time only three foreign families, Bohemian, Slovak and Polish, in this locality. Two months later with my wife, I visited the Jamestown Exposition, and stopped also to see our friends near Richmond. As my wife and I both liked it here, we bought a farm in the neighborhood of the three above named families, and rented it to one of them. By and by my countrymen from West and North moved down to Virginia, and I visited them from Pennsylvania several times a year, preaching to them and ministering to their spiritual needs, until in the spring, 1910, I settled my family on the farm with the intention of farming for my living, and serving spiritually my people. This I did free of any outside support for three years, until my missionary work branched out to such an extent that I could not keep up both in this way with very good success. Within the last two years this locality east of Richmond has become thickly populated, so that the number of families, including the settlements in New Kent County, may reach about 300. These foreign settlers are composed of Czechs or Bohemians, Slovaks, Poles, Ruthenians, and belong to various religious denominations — Presbyterians, Baptist, Lutheran, Nazaren and Catholic.

Kohout, Joseph Alois Bohemian Presbyterian Church photo smaller.jpg

Rev. Charles R. Stribling of the Tabb Street Presbyterian Church in Petersburg wrote in 1914 about the organization of the Bohemian Presbyterian Church:

On the day of the dedication, the building was packed with Bohemians — probably not a dozen Americans in the congregation. The former pastor, Rev. Frank Uherka, who had worked there most acceptably, was present and acted as an interpreter. He is now working at Jessup, Pa. Their present pastor, Rev. J.A. Kohout, whom I admire and love, gives much of his time to his own people, and for this receives little or no remuneration. The Presbytery and the Assembly’s Committee jointly employ him to work in Prince George County, and at mission points near Richmond. If you could have seen the tear-stained faces, the earnest tense expression on their countenances, as the congregation listened to the rugged eloquence of one of their elders, your soul would have been moved as mine was.

Rev. Kohout ministered not only to the community of New Bohemia, but also returned to his native Old Bohemia after World War I, where he labored to provide relief to orphans and to distribute Bible and evangelistic tracts. His wife wrote in 1922 of the challenges their family endured in his two-year absence and of God’s provision for them:

Among the first things which we did was to take our Heavenly Father at His word. Our salary was small, and we realized it to be insufficient for us to exist upon. Two of the older children were to go back to college, but for the sake of their father’s work overseas, were ready to abandon the idea and help support the family. But God in His goodness provided a way by which I could keep the family, that is those who remained at home, and a way opened also for the two older children to go back to the college. Our older daughter was given a position by the president of the college, which paid her board and room; and another younger daughter received a loan which she is paying up this year, by teaching.

R.E. Magill, Secretary and Treasurer of the Presbyterian Board of Publication (PCUS), wrote a glowing tribute in 1922 to Rev. Kohout’s work both at home and abroad.

With exceeding modesty, Mr. Kohout has given a few incidents of his helpful service to his own people, but from other sources it was learned that the exposure of the bitter cold and the hardships of travel in a poverty stricken country, put him in a hospital, where he was laid up for over three months….Mr. Kohout has assumed personal responsibility for the expenses of three of the orphans…Mr. Kohout supported himself and four assistants for sixteen months and published 50,000 evangelical tracts on a fund of less than one thousand American dollars, which was raised by friends when he went to the homeland.

An overriding concern and interest for Rev. Kohout in his ministry to New Bohemians and Old Bohemians was that they become citizens of heaven. In his own words:

Only as Christians will they really be useful and good citizens, and an honor to this grand old State of Virginia.

The Kohouts eventually moved back north, and both husband and wife were laid to rest in Erie Cemetery, Erie, Pennsylvania, after completing their earthly labors and entering into their heavenly rest. The story of their witness to immigrants in Virginia is a story of love, compassion and service. May it be an encouragement to 21st century Christians who seek to serve the kingdom of God wherever the need exists at home and abroad.