The First Hundred Years of American Presbyterian History

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Much of our knowledge of American Presbyterianism is focused on the 300+ year period dating from the establishment of the first Presbytery in Philadelphia in 1706 under the leadership of Francis Makemie, known as the “Father of American Presbyterianism.” The title of D.G. Hart and John R. Meuther’s Seeking a Better Country: 300 Years of American Presbyterianism, a wonderful book, is illustrative of this focus, which is a natural one given the nature of the event in 1706, and the challenges in documenting Presbyterianism in the earlier colonial era. But the organization of that Presbytery, which is an important historical marker in our timeline, presupposes the existence of Presbyterians and Presbyterian congregations which preceded it, a period which encompasses a full century prior. And there is much that we do know, or may reasonably conclude, about the first hundred years of Presbyterianism in America.

In fact, it is believed that colonial Jamestown, Virginia — the first permanent English settlement in North America, founded in 1607 — included among its company Puritan Anglican ministers of the Presbyterian persuasion, such as Robert Hunt (c. 1568-1608), Alexander Whitaker (1585-1616) and George Keith (c. 1585-?). These were men who did not conform to all of the rites and ceremonies of the Anglican church, but neither did they separate from it. Whitaker — most famous for baptizing Pocahontas and possibly officiating her marriage to John Rolfe — was a cousin to William Gouge, a member of the Westminster Assembly, and his June 18, 1614 letter to Gouge, constitutes the first written description of English ecclesiastical polity in America.

The colony on the James River, in Virginia, was established in 1607, by the Virginia Company of London. This company was to a great extent under the control of English Puritans who remained within the Established Church and were seeking to reform it from within. Some of the colonists sent to Virginia by the company were Puritans. Among these was the Rev. Alexander Whitaker, the “Apostle of Virginia,” son of Dr. William Whitaker, Puritan Professor of Divinity at Cambridge, and cousin of Dr. William Gouge, member of the Westminster Assembly of divines. Whitaker organized a congregational presbytery in the colony as may be seen from a letter written by him in June, 1614: “Every Sabbath day we preach in the forenoon, and catechize in the afternoon. Every Saturday, at night, I exercise in Sir Thomas Dale’s house. Our church affairs may be consulted on by the minister and four of the most religious men. Once every month we have communion, and once a year a solemn fast.” — Henry Alexander White, Southern Presbyterian Leaders, p. 12

The Collegiate (Dutch Reformed) Church in New Amsterdam (New York City) in 1619 was the first in America to be organized under the “Presbyterian Plan,” according to Robert L. Welsh, The Presbytery of Seattle, 1858-2005: The “Dream” of a Presbyterian Colony in the West, p. 14. This fact highlights the close relationship between Dutch Reformed and Presbyterian polity. Willem Apollonius (d. 1657), for example, was a “Dutch Presbyterian,” who won the approbation of the Westminster Assembly for his 1644 treatise on church government. The New Castle Presbyterian Church in New Castle, Delaware, one of the oldest Presbyterian congregations in America, had its origins due to the labors of the Dutch Reformed Church.

The first Presbyterian religious service in what is now Delaware appears to have been conducted in New Amstel (New Castle), in 1654, by the Dutch Domine Johannes Theodorus Polhemus, on his way to New Amsterdam from Brazil. The first pastor sent to this church by the Classis (Presbytery) of Amsterdam was Everardus Welius, in 1657. Previous to Welius’ coming Evert Pietersen, sent out as a schoolmaster, had opened there Delaware’s first school, enrolling twenty-five children. This church had a precarious existence, being without a pastor for long periods. After the English took the colony from the Dutch in 1664 some of its services were conducted in English. The last recorded services under Dutch religious auspices were in midsummer 1690, when Domine Rudolphus Varick preached three Sundays, and administered the communion. As was natural the next pastor was not Dutch. He was the Rev. John Wilson, from New England. He arrived in 1698, and preached in the court house, because the old Dutch church building had gone to decay. In 1707 a new church was erected. The New Castle church, therefore, appears to be the oldest Presbyterian church, and its building the oldest fabric still in use as a Presbyterian church, in Delaware. -- John W. Christie, Presbyterianism in Delaware

The Puritan emigration from Old England to New England in the late 1620s and early 1630s included thousands of Presbyterians. John White, the Patriarch of Dorchester, and a Westminster Divine, helped to establish a Presbyterian colony at Salem, Massachusetts in 1629 (C.A. Briggs, American Presbyterianism, p. 93). A Presbyterian group under the leadership of Abraham Pierson and Edward Howell left Lynn, Massachusetts in 1640, landed at Conscience Point, and ultimately established a Presbyterian congregation in Southampton, New York, paving the way for other Presbyterian congregations to be built on Long Island or near there: Southold (1640); Hempstead  (1643); East Hampton (1648); New Castle, Delaware (1651); Newtown (1652); Huntington (1658); Setauket (1660), and Jamaica (1662). The Long Island congregations, some of the oldest Presbyterian congregations in America, did not unite to form the Long Island Presbytery until 1717, but there is no doubt that their Presbyterian beginnings long preceded that date.

The names of John Youngs, Sr. (1598-1672); Richard Denton (1603-1662); Francis Doughty, Jr. (1605-1683); John Moore (1620-1657); Thomas James, Jr. (1621-1696); Nathaniel Brewster (1622-1690); Matthew Hill (?-1679); Zechariah Walker (1637-1699); among others, represent Presbyterian ministries in the middle colonies that all, mostly, predate those of Francis Makemie. The story of the first 100 years of American Presbyterianism spans the Eastern Seaboard, includes many heroic pioneers and brave heroes and heroines of the faith, whose adventures are known in part, and paved the way for the establishment of that first Presbytery in 1706. The 1640 Declaration of the Company by Edward Howell and the Southampton colonists, a document worthy of comparison to the Mayflower Compact, signified the goal of those early Presbyterians:

Our true interest and meaning is that when our Plantation is laid out by those appointed that there shall be a Church gathered and constituted according to the mind of Christ, that there we do freely lay down our power of ordering and disposing of the Plantation and of receiving inhabitants thereof or any other thing that may tend to the good and welfare of the inhabitants at the feet of Christ and His Church.

The English Puritan-Dutch Reformed-Scottish Presbyterian roots of what became a distinctly American form of Presbyterianism over the first century of the colonial era constitute a chapter much larger than what has been written here. But at Log College Press, we aim to shine the spotlight on that first hundred years, as well as on the three centuries since the founding of the first Presbytery. It is a rich history worthy to be more fully explored.

Some authorities consulted in the writing of this post include:

Freedom For All

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Jacob Green once famously declared in a 1778 sermon delivered in the midst of America’s War of Independence: “Can it be believed that a people contending for liberty should, at the same time, be promoting and supporting slavery?” Not all American Presbyterians have shared his sentiment at all times, and few issues historically have divided the Presbyterian Church like the issue of slavery; but generally speaking, a review of the early deliverances of the Presbyterian Church in this country — including the Reformed Presbyterian of North America (RPCNA) in 1800 which barred membership to slaveholders — reveals a stand against slavery and in favor of freedom for all.

An overture by a committee of the Synod of New York and Philadelphia made this memorable statement in 1787:

The Creator of the world having made of one flesh all the children of men, it becomes them as members of the same family, to consult and promote each other's happiness. It is more especially the duty of those who maintain the rights of humanity, and who acknowledge and teach the obligations of Christianity, to use such means as are in their power to extend the blessings of equal freedom to every part of the human race.

The final approved version of the 1787 Synodical statement was worded differently - encouraging religious education and supporting the eventual abolition of slavery. This final 1787 statement was republished by the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) in 1793. The following year, and for over two decades afterwards, an explanatory clause on the sin of man-stealing in connection with Question 142 (on the Eighth Commandment) in the Westminster Larger Catechism was published along with the Constitution of the PCUSA. For more details on this chapter in early American Presbyterian church history, see the relevant appendix in George Bourne’s Picture of Slavery in the United States of America, and Charles Hodge’s The Constitutional History of the Presbyterian Church, as well as this earlier Log College Press blog post about Bourne and RPCNA pastor Alexander McLeod regarding man-stealing. Also, the deliverances of Synod and the General Assembly on this subject may be consulted at our Minutes page.

Meanwhile, the profound and Biblical simplicity of the original 1787 statement on freedom for all remains worthy of remembrance. Even 155 years after ratification of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the struggle for freedom for all in America and around the world continues in some respects, and as God “hath made of one blood all nations of men” (Acts 17:26), we need not ask, as the lawyer did in Luke 10, “Who is my neighbor?” - not only is all mankind our neighbor, but especially the oppressed and those in need, such as the one to whom the Good Samaritan rendered aid. May the words of a committee in 1787 ring in the ears of Christians today, which call us to “use such means as are in [our] power to extend the blessings of equal freedom to every part of the human race.”

The Christian's "Cordon Bleu" - E.D. Warfield

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

For your own comfort's sake, and for the sake of your growth in grace, if you be a Christian, be a Christian, and be a marked and distinct one. — Charles Spurgeon, Morning and Evening (Oct. 14th)

“Cordon bleu” — “of the highest class.” While the world encourages us by one sort of standard, Christians have a different sort of standard to which we ought to aspire. So says Ethelbert Dudley Warfield in his devotional work, At the Evening Hour: Simple Talks on Spiritual Subjects (1898), in a chapter titled The Christian’s “Cordon Bleu.”

There is a striking scene in Cooper's "Last of the Mohicans" where the young captive chieftain, Uncas, is about to be taken to torture by his own kinsmen, the Delawares. He is taken from the prison tent and led to the stake, and there, his clothing being stripped off him, his fellow-tribesmen find upon his breast the totem of the royal house of their people, and at once recognize in him, instead of an enemy, a rightful ruler, and promptly yield to him the recognition which belonged to his birth.

So may it be with those who belong to the royal household of faith that when their own righteousness, which the prophet says is but filthy rags, is stripped away from them, their real character may be found stamped upon their lives — the simple yet sublime evidence of Christian faith. Then it will be that men will take knowledge of them, that they have been with Jesus. Then it will be that they will receive the promised reward of those who have been faithful over a few things.

Have we a proper realization of how important it is, we being Christians, that men shall take knowledge of us that we have been with Jesus ? Such witness-bearing is not merely an inevitable result of such companionship, but a precious privilege as well. It is not necessary to hang upon our breasts a service medal such as the soldiers of imperial France so proudly wore, such as you will find upon the breast of every battle-scarred veteran in Europe to-day, telling how he fought at Sedan or Gravelotte, how he rode with Scarlett and his gallant six hundred in the Crimea, or faced the fearful Arab charge at Tel-el-Kebir. But it is necessary that by loyalty to truth, constancy in temptation, and gentleness of life we shall let all men see and know that we have been with Jesus, and from him have learned the secret of a godly life.

Let no man rob you of your right. It is the most glorious and most honorable distinction that can be awarded by man: that men shall take knowledge of you, that you have been with Jesus.

Words to consider as we live out our Christian walk day by day in reliance upon the Holy Spirit. May it be said of us that we have been with Jesus.

Charles Hodge: No claim to originality

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Innovation in theology ought to be a red flag to Christians that signals a warning of trouble. Charles Hodge certainly thought so, as Ralph J. Danhof tells us in Charles Hodge as a Dogmatician, p. 43 (1929). We see this very clearly in a letter that Hodge wrote to the great Scottish Presbyterian William Cunningham dated August 24, 1857, which may be found in A.A. Hodge’s The Life of Charles Hodge, p. 430 (1880):

I have had but one object in my professional career and as a writer, and that is to state and to vindicate the doctrines of the Reformed Church. I have never advanced a new idea, and have never aimed to improve on the doctrines of our fathers. Having become satisfied that the system of doctrines taught in the symbols of the Reformed Churches is taught in the Bible, I have endeavored to sustain it, and am willing to believe even where I cannot understand.

At the semi-centennial celebration of Dr. Hodge’s professorship at Princeton Theological Seminary, on April 24, 1872, Hodge took the occasion to state:

I am not afraid to say that a new idea never originated in this Seminary.

While decrying any claim to originality in his ideas, Hodge was indeed gifted in his ability to articulate and to systematically summarize that which was Biblical and orthodox. For this gift, we in the 21st century, who continue to study the writings of this great theologian, give thanks to God.

Presbyterianism in Catechetical Form

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

A recent acquisition of interest from the library of the late Dr. Morton Smith is a small booklet titled Presbyterianism in Catechetical Form, compiled by Mrs. M.W. Pratt and published by the Presbyterian Committee of Publication in Richmond, Virginia (1893). This work has not yet been uploaded to Log College Press, but it is hoped that we can do so in the future.

Pratt, Mrs. M.W., Presbyterianism in Catechetical Form.jpg

It is written for the Presbyterian in the pews and others who desire to better understand the system of doctrine and polity embraced by our church and articulated in its standards. A particular extract concerning the Westminster Assembly may serve to whet the appetite for this valuable and rare little work.

Question 1. What are the names of the Presbyterian standards of faith and government?
Answer. “The Confession of Faith,” “The Larger and Shorter Catechisms,” and “The Book of Church Order.”

Q. 2. When were the Confession of Faith and Catechisms written?
A. In 1643-1649.

Q. 3. Where?
A. In England, in Westminster Abbey.

Q. 4. By whose order?
A. The British Parliament.

Q. 5. Who composed the Assembly that wrote them?
A. One hundred and forty-two divines, including four from Scotland, thirty-two laymen, including two from Scotland. (Hetherington’s Hist. Westminster, pp. 98, 99.)

Q. 6. Of what denominations were they?
A. Presbyterians and Independents.

Q. 7. Were they learned and good men?
A. Yes; they were among the most learned and godly men who ever adorned the British empire.

Q. 8. What did Richard Baxter of them?
A. That the Christian world since the days of the apostles had never had a Synod of more excellent divines than this and this and the Synod of Dort.

Q. 9. What vow did they take before beginning their work?
A. I do sincerely and solemnly protest, in the presence of Almighty God, that in the Assembly of which I am a member I will not maintain anything in matters of doctrine but what I think in my conscience to be the truth, or in point of discipline but what I consider to conduce most to the glory of God and the good and peace of the church.

Q. 10. How long were they in preparing this work?
A. More than five and a half years.

Q. 11. What did they was their object in thus formulating their doctrine and form of church government?
A. That a scheme of doctrine and form of church government pure and scriptural would be the most excellent means for establishing the rights for which they were contending, and forming the virtues by which freedom is blest.

Q. 12. Has their work proved them wise prophets?
A. Yes, it has done more good for the world than any other books ever written except the Bible.

Q. 13. What country approved and adopted their work?
A. Scotland, in their General Assemblies of 1647-1648.

Q. 14. Were these standards adopted by the church in America?
A. Yes, in Philadelphia, in May, 1788, with a slight change in regard to civil government.

S.J. Fisher: "Within is More!"

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Today’s post comes in the form of a meditation by African-American pastor and poet Samuel Jackson Fisher (1847-1928) found in The Romance of Pittsburgh or Under Three Flags, and Other Poems.

“Within is More!”

In famous Bruges — quaint old Flemish town —
On which the lofty belfry tower looks down,
There stands with fair and stately front a house
Whose legend ever must the thought arouse,
For this strange motto long it proudly bore,
Carved on its doorway beam: “Within is more;”
And he who reads it feels this cryptic word
His eager questioning has deeply stirred.

Yet may we not to this strange mystery
Find at our hand the long-sought key?
Fair is the front — without it charms the eye —
But home’s great charm and treasure inside lie.
No outside gaze can measure all the store
Of joys so hidden, for “Within is more.”

And so I love to think as to our eyes
The golden walls and domes of Heaven arise;
Tho’ fair is all now seen, and blest the view,
That still for us the ancient words are true.
And when in Love’s good time we pass the door,
Entranced we shall confess, “Within is more.”

Twins of Genius and the Sabbath Day

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

In 1884 and 1885, Mark Twain went on a series of lectures throughout the Northeast and even in Canada with the Presbyterian writer George Washington Cable, whom Twain described as “the South’s finest literary genius.” Cable had begun his career as a journalist, and had already established himself as a novelist also at that point. He was also controversial in the South for his support for racial equality. This popular series of lectures was billed as the “Twins of Genius Tour” and it had a profound effect on both men, as well as their audiences.

Their friendship began in 1881. Twain once wrote a high commendation of Cable to the editor of the Hartford, Connecticut Daily Courant (March 30, 1883).

On the evening of the fourth of April the gifted southerner whose name appears above, will deliver at Unity Hall, in Hartford, a lecture upon "Creole Women," sauced with illustrative readings from "The Grandissimes" and other of his books. Since he compliments us by choosing Hartford as the scene of his first experiment upon the northern platform, I trust we shall return him the compliment of a full house, and a hearty greeting. Mr. Cable is a reader and speaker whose matter is of the finest quality and whose arts of delivery are of distinguished excellence. It seems well to state this, in order that the public may know that Mr. Cable has something more to offer his audience, as an attraction, than his celebrated person alone. I heard him read in New Orleans last spring and in the proof-sheets of my forthcoming book I find this reference to that experience: "Mr. Cable is the only master in the writing of French dialects that the country has produced; and he reads them in perfection. It was a great treat to hear him read about Jean-ah Poquelin, and about Innerarity and his famous 'pigshoo' representing 'Louisihanna Rif-fusing to Hanter the Union,' along with passages of nicely-shaded German dialect from a novel which was still in manuscript."

"He also read conversations occurring between those charming Creole women of 'The Grandissimes' and in his mouth and through his art the music of their quaint and crippled English acquired a new and richer melody."

From such high authority as the voice of President Gilman of John's Hopkins university come praises of Mr. Cable's recent reading in Baltimore, which render this added testimony of mine next to unnecessary.

That this forthcoming lecture is not without interest outside of Hartford is evidenced by the fact that considerable deputations of well-known Bostonians and New Yorkers are coming here to attend it, and have already ordered their tickets. Also, I may state that Mr. Cable has been invited to repeat this entertainment in the Madison Square theatare, New York, at an early day, MARK TWAIN.

Yet, despite their friendship, Mark Twain remains famous for his loathing of his friend’s religion — Presbyterianism — and one prominent example of this appears in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, published in December 1884, while on tour with Cable. In Chapter XVIII, Huck visits a Presbyterian church.

Next Sunday we all went to church, about three mile, everybody a-horseback. The men took their guns along, so did Buck, and kept them between their knees or stood them handy against the wall. The Shepherdsons done the same. It was pretty ornery preaching -- all about brotherly love, and such-like tiresomeness; but everybody said it was a good sermon, and they all talked it over going home, and had such a powerful lot to say about faith and good works and free grace and preforeordestination, and I don't know what all, that it did seem to me to be one of the roughest Sundays I had run across yet.

Indeed, Cable’s commitment to keeping the Lord’s Day holy was a thorn in Twain’s side during the whole tour. Cable insisted that the pair not travel by railroad and not engage in lectures on the Sabbath day. James Stacy, the Southern Presbyterian minister, highlighted such transgressions of the Lord’s Day in his 1885 treatise on the Sabbath, Day of Rest: Its Obligations and Advantages.

Cable caused MT much irritation during their several months tour that involved shared platforms and hotel rooms in many states. At the outset, MT was unaware that Cable had fully retained the Sabbatarianism of their similar religious upbringing. Cable accepted without reservation from the Presbyterian standards that the Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy resting all that day, even from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days, and spending the whole time in the public and private exercises of God’s worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy…To the great annoyance of his tour partner, Cable refused to use a train on Sunday even in an emergency situation. MT wondered if the legalist would even be willing to travel to heaven on Sunday should he die on the first day of the week! One Saturday while on tour, Cable abruptly left a reception in order to scurry back to his hotel room before his self-imposed midnight curfew. An elder, choir member, and Sunday school superintendent in a New Orleans Presbyterian church, he attended Sunday School and two church services each Sunday without fail. At the beginning of the tour, eh read the Bible aloud to MT each evening. This activity, among others led MT to call him a “pious ass” and a “Christ-besprinkled psalm-singing Presbyterian.” (William E. Phipps, Mark Twain’s Religion, pp. 138-139).

After the tour was over, Twain wrote to William Dean Howells (Feb. 27, 1885), the following memorable reflection of Cable, which perhaps says more about himself than his friend:

It has been a curious experience. It has taught me that Cable’s gifts of mind are greater and higher than I suspected. But . . . you will never, never know, never divine, guess, imagine, how loathsome a thing the Christian religion can be made until you come to know and study Cable daily and hourly. Mind you I like him . . . but in him and his person I have learned to hate all religions. He has taught me to abhor and detest the Sabbath-day and hunt up new and troublesome ways to dishonor it.

The tour covered many cities in many states, and their divergent views of the Sabbath day did have some positive impact as well as negative (for Twain).

On Saturday, December 6, 1884, about a month into their “Twins of Genius” reading tour, Mark Twain and George Washington Cable were walking in Rochester, New York, when a sudden rain drove them to take shelter in a bookstore. Cable was a Sabbatarian who refused to travel on Sundays, so while on tour Twain usually spent that day in his hotel room resting up, and he needed something to read in Rochester. On Cable’s recommendation he left the bookstore with a copy of Le Morte D’Arthur, Thomas Mallory’s tales about the Round Table. The rest, as they say, is Mark Twain’s version of medieval history — A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court. Cable proudly proclaimed the “godfathership of that book,” but that title only begins to indicate his role in the novel Twain wrote, and the influence that the reading tour had on its genesis and development. The novel, in turn, can help us appreciate the relationship between these “Twins” (Stephen Railton in Peter Messent and Louis J. Budd, eds., A Companion to Mark Twain, p. 172).

At the end of the tour, Cable wrote to his wife, “I got him out to church at last!” But Cable was saddened by some articles attacking his character which appeared in the Boston Herald in May 1885 and which appeared to be sourced by Twain; yet their friendship endured, and prior to Twain’s death, Cable referred to their joint tour as “one of the most notable experiences of my life.”

The intersection of these two writers’ lives is a moment in history worthy of study and reflection, and the crucial role of the Christian Sabbath in that convergence especially should not be forgotten.

Holiness defined - and encouraged - by Samuel Davies

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Holiness, to which all Christians are called — “Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” (Heb. 12:14) — is defined by Samuel Davies succinctly in words that have been quoted by others* writing on the nature of the “practice of piety.”

Preaching on that verse, Davies explains in a sermon titled “The Connection Between Present Holiness and Future Felicity” (Sermons, Vol. 1):

The most intelligible description of holiness, as it is inherent in us, may be this: “It is a conformity in heart and practice to the revealed will of God.” As the Supreme Being is the standard of all perfection, his holiness in particular is the standard of ours. Then we are holy when his image is stamped upon our hearts and reflected in our lives; so the apostle defines it, and that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. Eph. iv. 24. Whom he did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son. Rom. viii. 29. Hence holiness may be defined, “A conformity to God in his moral perfections.” But as we cannot have a distinct knowledge of these perfections but as they are manifested by the revealed will of God, I choose to define holiness, as above, “A conformity to his revealed will.” Now his revealed will comprises both the law and the gospel; the law informs us of the duty which we as creatures owe to God as a being of supreme excellency, as our Creator and Benefactor, and to men as our fellow-creatures; and the gospel informs us of the duty which we as sinners owe to God as reconcilable through a Mediator. Our obedience to the former implies the whole of morality, and to the latter the whole of evangelical graces, as faith in a Mediator, repentance, &c.

From this definition of holiness it appears, on the one hand, that it is absolutely necessary, to see the Lord; for unless our dispositions are conformed to him, we cannot be happy in the enjoyment of him; and on the other hand, that they who are made thus holy, are prepared for the vision and fruition of his face, as they can relish the divine pleasure.

But as a concise definition of holiness may give an auditory but very imperfect ideas of it, I shall expatiate upon the dispositions and practices in which it consists, or which naturally result from it; …

Even the best, most succinct, definitions require further elucidation, as the rest of Davies’ sermon illustrates (which can be read here). But as it helps to define the topic under consideration, and because this topic is crucial to the Christian life, we do well to start with Davies’ definition in our understanding of what holiness consists. In conformity to God’s revealed will, may his image indeed be stamped upon our hearts and reflected in our lives.

* For example, Charles D. Cashdollar, “The Pursuit of Piety: Charles Hodge's Diary, 1819-1820.” Journal of Presbyterian History (1962-1985), vol. 55, no. 3, 1977, p. 267; Hughes Oliphant Old, The Reading and Preaching of the Scriptures in the Worship of the Christian Church, Vol. 5, p. 163; Elwyn Allen Smith, The Presbyterian Ministry in American Culture: A Study in Changing Concepts, 1700-1900, p. 148.

Addressed to a Student of Divinity: A Poem by Annis Stockton

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

One of the first published female poets in America was Annis Boudinot Stockton, daughter of Elias Boudinot IV, wife of Richard Stockton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. Her correspondence with and poetic tribute to George Washington is noteworthy, but she wrote poems on many subjects. Today’s post will highlight a poem she is thought to have sent to Princeton student and fellow poet Benjamin Young Prime (1733-1791) around 1757. It may be found, along with all of her known compositions, in Carla Mulford, ed., Only for the Eye of a Friend: The Poems of Annis Boudinot Stockton.

Addressed to a Student of Divinity

How blest the youth whom Genius deigns to guide,
Thro paths of Science to fair wisdoms Seat —
Where virtue and philosophy preside —
And trample error underneath their feet.
Whose Steady mind can from the croud retire —
In Search of truth to turn the historic page —
The rise and fall of empire to admire —
And mark the effect of vice on ev’ry age. —
Whose taste and fancy urge him to the groves —
O’er craggy rocks or mountain steep to climb
Or thro the secret haunts of nature roves —
And deeply meditates on themes sublime.
There taught by reason to controul the will —
And hush the Jarring passions into peace —
Their vast extent and influence to feel —
And how Combin’d with human happiness.
But happies he whom piety Controuls —
To shun a flattering worlds decietful way —
To break the bread of life to hungry souls —
And prompt the path of bliss to those that stray.

Genius and Science polish and refine —
Philosophy and virtue lend their aid —
While truth and wisdom mark the true divine —
Be this the path and this the pattern too —
Then follow on with all your noblest powers —
Nor let your Secret foes your mind subdue —
But to your Saviour dedicate your hours. —

Devotionals for a New Decade

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

A good way to start the New Year in 2020 is just the way 19th century American Presbyterians started it - with a yearly devotional. Here are some options available for use at Log College Press:

Other devotional works to take special note of:

  • James Robert Boyd - Daily Communion With God on the Plan Recommended by the Rev. Matthew Henry, V.D.M., For Beginning, Spending, Concluding Each Day With God (1873); and

  • William Henry Fentress - Love Truths From the Bible (1879).

These resources will enrich your 2020 spiritual walk just as they enriched the lives of Christians in centuries past. Blessings to you and yours from Log College Press!

Out with the old, in with the New: Sermons for a New Year

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

As 2019 comes to a close, and a new year dawns, we at Log College Press want to thank all of our readers for all of your support in the past year. We are most grateful for your interest, appreciation, feedback and encouragement. It is a joy for us to dust off old Presbyterian works and make them accessible to a new generation, and we, along with our readers, are learning much along the journey as well. As we round out this year and prepare, with the mercy and blessing of God, to enter another, we wish to highlight some special sermons from the past which are worthy of consideration.

  • Henry Augustus Boardman (1808-1880) - Mottoes For the New Year, as Given in Texts of Sermons (1882);

  • George Barrell Cheever (1807-1890) - A New Year’s Sermon (1843);

  • Samuel Davies (1723-1761) - On January 1, 1760, he preached "A New Year's Gift" (see Sermons on Important Subjects, Vol. 3, Serm. 59, pp. 309 ff), using Rom. 13:11 for his text: "And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed." On January 1, 1761 (his last year of life), Davies preached "A Sermon on the New Year" (see Sermons on Important Subjects, Vol. 2, Serm. 34, pp. 139 ff), from Jer. 28:16: "This year thou shalt die";

  • Elias Harrison (1790-1863) - New Year’s Day Sermon (1817);

  • Erskine Mason, Sr. (1805-1851) - The Approach of Death: A New Year’s Sermon (1845) and New Year’s Sermon for 1848: Dependence on the Future (1848);

  • Benjamin Morgan Palmer (1818-1902) - Century Sermon (1901), preached on January 1, 1901; and

  • Gardiner Spring (1785-1873) - Something Must Be Done: A New Year’s Sermon (1816).

Each of these sermons has a message that is good for 21st century readers to consider as we stand at the same point on the calendar between years that Christians have done before. New Year’s is always an appropriate time to review the past and consider our resolve to walk closer with the Lord in the future. We close with this meditation and resolution from Gardiner Spring’s “Reflections on the New Year” in Fragments from the Study of a Pastor (1838):

In entering on another year, I know not from what unexpected quarter, or at what an unguarded hour, difficulties and dangers may come. O that I could enjoy more of the favour of God, more of the presence of the Saviour, more of the sealing of the ever blessed Spirit! O for more of a calm, approving conscience, and more of the delightful influence of the peace-speaking blood of Jesus Christ!

G.M. Giger on Religious Retirement

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

The busyness of a 24/7 news cycle, the pressing demands of work, the noise of children and neighbors - and much more - all conspire, it seems, to crowd out the quiet times that are so necessary to spend with God, and to gain peace of mind and enrich our souls. Just as the body needs sleep at periodic intervals, so the soul needs time apart from the cares of the world, even the necessary ones, to commune with God in prayer, to be fed by God’s Word, and to ponder deeply the things most needful to be considered in life.

Christ Himself shows us by example the great importance which we ought to place upon such times apart from the noise and bustle of the world: “And in the morning, rising up a great while before day, He went out and departed into a solitary place, and there prayed” (Mark 1:35).

Preaching from this text, George Musgrave Giger (most famous for translating Francis Turretin’s Institutes of Elenctic Theology) reminds us of the value of Religious Retirement, that is, the need to be alone with God for purposes of prayer, study and meditation. This sermon, published in John T. Duffield’s The Princeton Pulpit (1852), while warning against the opposite extreme of monastic-like separation from the world, emphasizes the following motives to and benefits of such religious retirement.

  • Christ’s own frequent and habitual example;

  • Christ’s precept regarding private worship that “when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret, and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly” (Matt. 6:6);

  • God’s creation of day and night, and times of action and stillness;

  • The example of Old Testament saints, such as David and Daniel, who sought out and regularly kept times of private devotion;

  • The example of early Christians who sought sanctuary for prayer away from their persecutors;

  • The cases of John Milton and John Bunyan, for example, whose times of private devotion in the study and in the prison cell led to such rich spiritual writings by which the Church and the world have been blessed;

  • Private devotion, apart from distraction, provides the best means for the study necessary to gain religious knowledge, which is key to our spiritual life and sanctification;

  • Religious retirement provides the opportunity for profitable self-examination, which is needful for correction in life and the amendment of our ways, and necessary for daily confession of sin and repentance before God;

  • Times apart from the world help us to get perspective on the world and its cares by viewing temporal concerns through the light of an eternal lens; and

  • Contemplation of eternal things stirs our affection towards and increases our attachment to heaven.

While the 21st century world encourages a “coming out of the closet,” Giger’s 19th century message to return regularly to the closet for private devotion is a reminder needed more now than ever. We all need such times apart from the cares of this world to commune with our God, and to enrich our souls through prayer and study and meditation. Read his full message here and be encouraged, especially as a new year approaches, to follow the example of Christ and regularly seek out religious retirement.

Archibald Alexander on Christian sympathy

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

John Alexander Mackay writes of Archibald Alexander in Hugh T. Kerr, ed., Sons of the Prophets: Leaders in Protestantism from Princeton Seminary, pp. 9-10:

The popular preacher of Pine Street [Philadelphia Presbyterian Church] was also a warm and tender pastor. In the great Pauline tradition, Archibald Alexander had a shepherd’s heart. He loved people and was the friend and counselor of all who needed help….

Nowhere does the soul of the preacher blend so perfectly and symbolically with the heart of the pastor as in the discourse Alexander was asked to deliver at a special service…, following the burning of the theater in Richmond [Virginia]. In this conflagration, seventy-five persons lost their lives, including the Governor of the state of Virginia. Speaking from the text “Weep with them that weep” (Rom. 12:15) the preacher analyzed and applied the principle of sympathy as prescribed by the Christian religion in contrast to the cold impassivity of the Stoic ethic.

In Alexander’s words (A Discourse Occasioned by the Burning of the Theatre in the City of Richmond, Virginia, on the Twenty-Sixth of December, 1811 (1812)):

One leading difference between the system of ethics prescribed by the Stoics, and that inculcated by Christianity is, that whilst the former aims at eradicating the passions, the latter endeavours to regulate them, and direct them into their proper channels. The attempt of the first is as impracticable as is undesirable; the object of the last, is, by divine aid, in a good degree attainable, and in it consists much of the dignity, perfection, and happiness of man.

The great Author of our being has implanted the principle of sympathy deeply in human nature; and has made the susceptibility of feeling the sorrows of another, as extensive as the race of man. It is common to the untutored savage, and to the man of refinement and education: and traces of it are even discovered in the animal creation; many species of which appear to be strongly excited, as often as any great evil threatens, or befals, any of their own kind.

This principle of sympathy, whilst it indicates the unity of our species, seems to form a mysterious bond of connexion between all its members….

But, however sympathy may be abused, there is a legitimate and proper exercise of it, to which we are not only prompted by nature, but directed by reason, and exhorted by religion. There are occasions, when not to "weep with them that weep," would be rebellion against every principle which ought to govern us, as well as against those which commonly do influence men. If the sufferings of an enemy may be such as to affect us — if we are excited to weep at the woes of a stranger — what must our feelings be, when we recognise, in the cry of unutterable anguish, the well known voice of an acquaintance, a friend, a brother, or a sister? Such a cry of distress, from the capital of our native state, has recently pierced our ears, and filled our hearts with grief. The sons of Virginia, resident in this place, are to-day called upon to mourn, and to mingle their sympathetic tears with those of the whole state.

Let us be mindful that to “weep with them that weep” is the mark of a tender, Christian heart. When the circumstances call for sympathy, Christians must mingle their tears with those who are aching, adding our prayers too. May the Lord deliver us from hearts of stone, and grant us tears when sympathy is called for and prayers for those in need. Alexander closes his discourse with this thought:

My last advice, therefore, is, BECOME REAL CHRISTIANS. Make religion a personal concern. Attend to it without delay. "Remember now thy in the days of thy youth." And may the God of all grace crown the exercises of this day with his blessing, for Christ's sake.

The Book that would understand me: Émile Cailliet and the Bible

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Émile Cailliet was born in Dampierre, France on December 17, 1894. He served in the French armed forces in World War I, and distinguished himself with many degrees from the Universities of Montpelier and Strasbourg. After coming to America, he served as a professor French literature at the University of Pennsylvania; Scripps College and Claremont Graduate School in California; and Wesleyan University in Connecticut. In 1960, he began to teach Christian philosophy at Princeton Theological Seminary, in which capacity he continued until his death in 1983. He translated and edited select works of Blaise Pascal, and wrote about him in The Clue to Pascal (1944) and Pascal: The Emergence of Genius (1961); as well as The Christian Approach to Culture (1953). He and his wife were members of the Presbyterian Church.

He also wrote several articles in Eternity magazine, one which tells a remarkable autobiographical account of his coming to Christ. Although we do not currently have any works by Cailliet on Log College Press, this extract is given as a profound testimony worth remembering.

I was born in a small village of France and received an education that was naturalistic to the core. This could possibly have had a great deal to do with the fact that I did not even see a Bible before I reached the age of twenty-three.

To say that this naturalistically inspired education proved of little help through front-line experiences as a lad of twenty in World War I would amount to quite an understatement. When your own buddy - at the time speaking to you of his mother - dies standing in front of you, a bullet in his chest, what use is the sophistry of naturalism? Was there a meaning to it all?

One night a bullet got me, too. An American field ambulance crew saved my life and later the use of a badly shattered arm was restored. After a nine-month stay at the hospital, I was discharged and resumed graduate work.

During my stay at the American hospital, I had married a Scotch-Irish girl whom I had met in Germany on Christmas Eve the year before the war had broken out. She was, and has always remained, a deeply evangelical person. I am ashamed to confess that she must have been hurt to the very core of her being as I made it clear that religion would be taboo in our home. Little did I realize at the time that a militant attitude often betrays an inner turmoil.

I had returned to my books, but they were no longer the same books. Neither was my motivation the same motivation. Reading in literature and philosophy, I found myself probing in depth for meaning. During long night watches in the foxholes, I had in a strange way been longing - I must say it, however queer it may sound - for a book that would understand me.

But I knew of no such book. Now I would in secret prepare one for my own private use. And so, as I went on reading for my courses I would file passages that would speak to my condition, then carefully copy them in a leatherbound pocket book I would always carry with me. The quotations, which I numbered in red ink for easier reference, would mead me as it were from fear and anguish, through a variety of intervening stages, to supreme utterances of release and jubilation.

The day came when I put the finishing touch to "the book that would understand me," speak to my condition, and help me through life's happenings. A beautiful, sunny day it was. I went out, sat under a tree, and opened my precious anthology. As I went on reading, however, a growing disappointment came over me. Instead of speaking to my condition, the various passages reminded me of their context, of the circumstances of my labor over their selection.

Then I knew that the whole undertaking would not work, simply because it was of my own making. It carried no strength of persuasion. In a dejected mood, I put the little book back in my pocket.

At that very moment, my wife - who, incidentally, knew nothing of the project on which I had been working - appeared at the gate of the garden, pushing the baby carriage.

It had been a hot afternoon. She had followed the main boulevard only to find it too crowded. So she had turned to a side street which she could not name because we had only recently arrived in town. The cobblestones had shaken the carriage so badly that she had pondered what to do. Whereupon, having spotted a patch of grass beyond a small archway, she had gone in with the baby for a period of rest.

It turned out that the patch of grass led to an outside stone staircase which she had climbed without quite realizing what she was doing. At the top, she had seen a long room, door wide open. So she entered.

At the further end, a white-haired gentleman worked at a desk. He had not become aware of her presence. Looking around, she noticed the carving of a cross. Thus she suddenly realized that this office was a part of a church building - of a Huguenot church edifice hidden away as they all are, even long after the danger of persecution has passed. The venerable-looking gentleman was the pastor.

She walked to his desk and heard herself say, "Have you a Bible in French?"

He smiled and handed over to her a copy, which she eagerly took from his hand; then she walked out with a mixed feeling of both joy and guilt.

As she now stood in front of me, she meant to apologize, but I was no longer listening to her.

"A Bible, you say? Where is it? Show me. I have never seen one before!"

She complied. I literally grabbed the book and rush to my study with it. I opened and "chanced" upon the Beatitudes! I read, and read, and read - now aloud with an indescribable warmth surging within. I could not find words to express my awe and wonder. And suddenly the realization dawned upon me: this was the book that would understand me!

I continued to read deeply into the night, mostly from the Gospels. And lo and behold, as I looked through them, the One of whom they spoke, the One who spoke and acted in them became alive to me.

The providential circumstances amid which the book had found me now made it clear that while it seemed absurd to speak of a book understanding a man, this could be said of the Bible because its pages were animated by the presence of the living God and the power of his mighty acts. To this God I prayed that night, and the God who answered was the same God of whom it was spoken in the book. (Eternity magazine, July 1974).

The Making of a Minister by Russell Cecil

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Among the many notable addresses given at the Centennial Celebration of Princeton Theological Seminary in 1912 is one titled “The Making of a Minister” by Russell Cecil (1853-1925), who at the time was serving as Moderator of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUS).

He begins by establishing some of the necessary prerequisites for any minister, and goes on to describe what else is important and most valuable in the building blocks of the ministry.

Among those things that are essential and necessary, he says, are the following:

  • a minister must be male;

  • a minister must be godly;

  • a minister must be learned in the Scriptures; and

  • a minister must be called to his office by God.

Other non-essential, but nevertheless important and helpful factors in what makes up a good ministerial candidate, highlighted by Cecil, include the following:

  • a godly, religious, stable upbringing, emphasizing the influence of family and education;

  • a wholesome spiritual atmosphere at seminary, which is conducive to the spiritual and academic learning by the student of the ministry;

  • a course of theological study that is broad and encompasses a full range of useful matter for pastoral ministry; and

  • a studied effort to improve one’s method of expression, including both composition and delivery of the message.

It was also Cecil’s view that every pastor should be imbued with “the missionary spirit,” no matter whether they were going to be established at a country church or sent to foreign shores. An evangelistic zeal for sharing the gospel should be part of the spirit of one’s theological training that one should carry with them throughout their pastoral career.

He closes with this thought:

I close with the remark that Christian people every where feel that humanizing influences should be thrown around the young men in our seminaries; that they should not be cloistered scholastics, withdrawn from the stirring life of the day; but that they should be men of loving hearts, who, when they come forth to their work, are able to sympathize with the poor and needy, and know how to dispense the gospel of the grace of God to our perishing race.

Read the full address by Cecil here and see how he fleshes out his message. It is a worthy read about “The Making of a Minister,” a most excellent and noble calling.

The man who founded the Stone Lectures at Princeton

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

The Stone Lectures constitute a famous tradition that encompasses Abraham Kuyper’s Lectures on Calvinism (1898) and Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation (1908), among other notable examples. But for whom are these lectures given bi-annually at Princeton Theological Seminary named?

Levi Payson Stone was born on May 1, 1802 in Wendell, Massachusetts. Raised in a religious household, he became a successful businessman. His father’s counsel, which he followed, was: “See to it my child, that the world does not get too strong a hold of your affections. It is a deadly enemy to the soul. Be diligent in business, fervent in spirit, serving the Lord.”

One key moment in his life was the reading of Charles Hodge’s The Way of Life.

…the thing that brought him to the light, and gave him settled convictions, was the reading of Dr. Charles Hodge's Way of Life, in which the words in II Cor. 5: 14, were explained in a way that was new to him. When he saw what the Apostle meant in saying, "If one died for all, then were all dead," — that is, not that all were dead in sin before Christ died for them, but that all died in Him to sin when He died; — " If one died for all, then all died;" — when he caught sight of this clear statement of a vicarious atonement in which the Lord Jesus became the sinner's substitute, bearing the penalty in his stead, his mind was filled with light and peace. And ever afterward he seemed grateful to the man who had been the means of opening his eyes. To some extent, this doubtless explains the deep interest he took in Princeton Seminary, in which Dr. Hodge was a professor.

He made a personal covenant which reads as follows:

Lord's day, July 4, 1830. It is this month two years since I began to indulge a hope in the mercy of God in Jesus Christ; and one year this day since I took upon me the vows of God in pubhc, and was admitted into the communion and fellowship of the church. Relying on the promises to repenting sinners of acceptance through the Redeemer, I do this day renewedly devote myself to the service of God; all my faculties of body and mind, all my time, property and influence, resolving to bring into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ, and to live no longer unto myself, but unto Him that died for me, choosing Him for my whole portion for time and eternity. Through divine assistance. — L. P. S.

In his memoir, one can read snatches of his poetry from the journal that he kept during this time. It was in 1841 that he was ordained to serve as a deacon at the Brick Presbyterian Church in New York City. Gardiner Spring was the pastor of that congregation at the time.

After retiring in 1866, Stone endowed the L.P. Stone Lectureship at Princeton Theological Seminary in 1871. Shortly before his death in 1884, he bequeathed to the same seminary a collection of old Puritan books. Both a director and a trustee of Princeton Theological Seminary, he also served as director of the German Theological Seminary at Newark, New Jersey (now known as Bloomfield College).

After an illness, he entered into glory on December 31, 1884. The prayer at his memorial service was offered by A.A. Hodge. His name lives on not only through the lectureship which he sponsored, but also in the Book of Life in which all saints are held in precious remembrance. “Precious in the sight of the LORD is the death of his saints” (Ps. 116:15). Read more about his life and legacy here.

How a conversation in Latin led Charles Beatty into the ministry

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Samuel Miller tells the tale of how Charles Beatty, as a teenager, having emigrated from his native Northern Ireland and arrived in America with a measure of classical education already under his belt, in the providence of God, met William Tennent, Sr., the founder of the Log College. Their encounter was a memorable one, which led to a great chapter in the history of God’s kingdom on earth.

The Rev. Charles Beatty was a native of Ireland. He obtained a pretty accurate classical education in his own country; but his circumstances being narrow, he migrated to America, and employed several of the first years of his residence on this side of the Atlantic in the business of a pedlar. In the pursuit of this vocation, he halted, one day, at the “Log College,” on the Neshaminy, then under care of the Reverend William Tennent the elder. The pedlar, to Mr. Tennent’s surprise, addressed him in correct Latin, and appeared to be familiar with that language. After much conversation, in which Mr. Beatty manifested fervent piety, and considerable religious knowledge, as well as a good education in other respects, Mr. Tennent addressed him thus — “You must quit your present employment. Go and sell the contents of your pack, and return immediately, and study with me. It will be a sin for you to continue a pedlar, when you may be so much more useful in another profession.” He accepted Mr. Tennent’s offer; returned to Neshaminy; completed there his academical and theological studies; and in due time became an eminent minister. He died in Barbadoes, wither he had gone to solicit benefactions for the college of New-Jersey [Princeton], about the time of Mr. Rodgers’ removal to New-York (Memoirs of the Rev. John Rodgers, D.D., p. 109).

Beatty went on to serve as the pastor of Tennent’s church at Neshaminy, and as a missionary on the western frontier. He was a close friend and companion of David Brainerd. Although born in Ulster and buried on the Caribbean island of Barbados, his name is remembered as an American Presbyterian pastor and pioneer missionary of great eminence. And in the providence of God, it was his knowledge of Latin that led him to a life of service to Christ and his kingdom.

Stepping Heavenward at Log College Press

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Even in the 21st century, Stepping Heavenward by Elizabeth Payson Prentiss constitutes one the most beloved spiritual classics in print today. It comes from the pen of a 19th century American Presbyterian writer, who left a legacy of literature for young ladies, in particular, which has recently been added to Log College Press.

The daughter of the famous Congregationalist minister Edward Payson, and later the wife of Presbyterian minister George Lewis Prentiss, at the age of 12 Elizabeth made a profession of faith at the Bleecker Street Presbyterian Church in New York City.

She returned to New York City in 1851, but within a year, she lost two of her children. The sufferings in her life inspired her writings. As she once said, “Much of my experience of life has cost me a great price and I wish to use it for strengthening and comforting other souls.” This quote comes from The Life and Letters of Elizabeth Prentiss, published by her husband. Alfred Nevin, in the Encyclopedia of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, tell us that “Her memoir…is one of the most beautiful of religious biographies.”

Take time to read her famous classic, as well as her other writings, which are available here. See the publications of her husband here.

Joseph B. Stratton on the Kingship of Christ

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

What does it mean when the Apostle Paul says that Jesus Christ is “the head over all things to the church” (Eph. 1:22)? No Christian questions whether Christ is King over the church. But is more meant by Paul than that simple proposition? Joseph Buck Stratton answers in a sermon preached on December 27, 1857 entitled “The Kingship of Christ” (A Pastor’s Valedictory: A Selection of Early Sermons (1899), pp. 20-21).

But the Scriptures teach much more than that Christ reigns in his church. He reigns also for the church. He is King in regard to whatsoever concerns the church. He commands and controls whatsoever can affect the church. Thus he is said to be "head over all things to the church." The world, out of which the church is gathered, and in which it exists, is not independent of his dominion, and is under his regimen, for the sake of the church. It does not tolerate the church, but it is tolerated on account of the church. It was made for Christ's kingdom; it is preserved in order to the completion of his kingdom; and when it is needed no more for his kingdom's sake, it will exist no more. And while it stands, it has no power in an atom of it to move against his consent, or his bidding, and is working together in all its parts for the accomplishment of his mediatorial purposes, and for good to them that love God and are the called according to his purpose. Hence his promise in regard to the church "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

And so he is king in regard to whatsoever is connected with the mission end of the church; "I am with you always," he said to his apostles when he gave them the charge to go and make disciples of all nations; and this word, "I am with you always," dwelling as it does as an ever living promise in the bosom of the church, is a security that his kingship is ever co-operating with the church. He is reigning over the world and in the world, for the furtherance of the work of the church. Just as he is said to have been in the church of old "in the wilderness," and just as he opened the sea, and made the rock gush with water, and the heavens rain down manna, and the walls of hostile cities fall to the ground, and the hearts of brave armies quail before the terror of his presence; for their deliverance and their triumph, so still, he is in the midst of the Sacramental host of his elect. And though their wanderings may seem long, and their victory and their inheritance seem to tarry strangely in their coming, yet, as surely as Israel reached the promised land, Christ, the King, in the greatness of his strength will travel with his church, till he and she together shall cross the last entrenchment of the enemy, and trample the ruins of the last stronghold of Satan beneath their feet. Such then, is his kingdom, the church; and the world so far as it is regarded as the scene and the subject of the church's operation.

This doctrine of the mediatorial kingship of Christ over all things for the good of his church, as taught by Paul and expounded upon here by Stratton, is a great comfort to believers in the midst of a hostile world. Christ has been appointed king for purposes that not only give glory to God but will do his people good not only by ruling and defending us, but also, in the words of the Westminster Shorter Catechism, “restraining and conquering all his and our enemies” (Q/A 26). “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth” (Matt. 28:18), he says. In his mediatorial office of King, the scope of his dominion is universal, and thus, he reigns over all and the victory over all belongs to him - praise to our King!

James W.C. Pennington - The first African-American to receive a European doctorate of divinity

(Receive our blog posts in your email by clicking here. If the author links in this post are broken, please visit our Free PDF Library and click on the author’s page directly.)

Today marks a milestone worth remembering in American Presbyterian history: 170 years ago on December 19, 1849, James W.C. Pennington, the fugitive slave blacksmith who became a Presbyterian minister, was awarded the degree of Doctor of Divinity by the University of Heidelberg, Germany — thereby becoming the first African-American to receive this honor from a European university.

The story of this honorary degree is told by Herman E. Thomas in James W.C. Pennington: African American Churchman and Abolitionist (Studies in African American History and Culture and by Christopher L. Webber in American to the Backbone: The Life of James W. C. Pennington, the Fugitive Slave Who Became One of the First Black Abolitionists (2011). As Webber notes, the faculty told Pennington on that momentous occasion that “You are the first African who has received this dignity from a European university, and it is the University of Heidelberg that thus pronounces the universal brotherhood of humanity.”

Self-taught and able in Greek, Latin and German; author of the scholarly A Text Book of the Origin and History of the Colored People (1841) (and later, the fascinating autobiography, The Fugitive Blacksmith; or, Events in the History of James W.C. Pennington, Pastor of a Presbyterian Church, New York, Formerly a Slave in the State of Maryland, United States (1850); and social activist as well as minister of the gospel; Pennington was a worthy selection by the faculty for this honor, although Pennington, with humility and grace, stated that he did not deserve this award but accepted it as a tribute to his race. What is particularly remarkable is that his academic attainments came through the extra effort required by being denied enrollment at Yale Divinity School, and though he was permitted to attend and audit classes, he was barred from speaking in class or borrowing library books. The hurdles he overcame both before and after he escaped from slavery in order to exercise his liberty and pursue his dreams are one thing; the freedom he found in Christ, as all Christians can testify, is even more profound.

“In 2011, the Heidelberg Center for American Studies (HCA) and the Faculty of Theology of Heidelberg University established the James W.C. Pennington Award.” Source: University of Heidelberg (https://www.hca.uni-heidelberg.de/forschung/pennington_en…

“In 2011, the Heidelberg Center for American Studies (HCA) and the Faculty of Theology of Heidelberg University established the James W.C. Pennington Award.”
Source: University of Heidelberg (https://www.hca.uni-heidelberg.de/forschung/pennington_en.html)

We pause today to remember and to reflect upon this milestone achievement by James W.C. Pennington and what it represents in the history of African-Americans, Presbyterians and the world.